Talk:Chairo (slang): Difference between revisions
→Original research and reliable sources: new section |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
As for [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Chairo_(slang)&diff=774000301&oldid=773990082 this edit], its inclusion might be notable - ''if'' - it received coverage in reliable sources. The problem is with your source- it may not meet reliability due to political slant. ([[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources]]) My personal oppinion is that inlusion of Calderon's, an ex-President, usage is notable. My personal opinion is irrelevant though. A better source is needed. [[User:AuroralColibri|AuroralColibri]] ([[User talk:AuroralColibri|talk]]) 04:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC) |
As for [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Chairo_(slang)&diff=774000301&oldid=773990082 this edit], its inclusion might be notable - ''if'' - it received coverage in reliable sources. The problem is with your source- it may not meet reliability due to political slant. ([[Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources]]) My personal oppinion is that inlusion of Calderon's, an ex-President, usage is notable. My personal opinion is irrelevant though. A better source is needed. [[User:AuroralColibri|AuroralColibri]] ([[User talk:AuroralColibri|talk]]) 04:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC) |
||
@[[User:AuroralColibri]], so where is your reliable source for this statement?: "...is a pejorative epithet used in Mexico to describe an individual who holds a far-left ideology." Also, the news portal Aristegui Noticias, the source I used [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Chairo_(slang)&diff=774000301&oldid=773990082 here], was the [https://www.icfj.org/knight-international-journalism-award-winners recipient of the Knight International Journalism Award] by the [[International Center for Journalists]] in 2016, so how is this not a reliable source?. |
Revision as of 21:07, 30 May 2017
Mexico C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Original research and reliable sources
@User:PsytranceGuru, Wikipedia is all about what reliable sources say, not what we as individual editors, want. That means no unsourced changes and no original research. Please read the policies: Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:No original research.
The issues with your edits: this edit is particularly problematic. Not only are you violating neutrality (Wikipedia:Neutral point of view), your changes may constitute original research. The changes to definition are not supported by the existing sources. Changes based on your personal "research"/experience are not acceptable- please provide a reliable source for alternative usage.
As for this edit, its inclusion might be notable - if - it received coverage in reliable sources. The problem is with your source- it may not meet reliability due to political slant. (Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources) My personal oppinion is that inlusion of Calderon's, an ex-President, usage is notable. My personal opinion is irrelevant though. A better source is needed. AuroralColibri (talk) 04:51, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
@User:AuroralColibri, so where is your reliable source for this statement?: "...is a pejorative epithet used in Mexico to describe an individual who holds a far-left ideology." Also, the news portal Aristegui Noticias, the source I used here, was the recipient of the Knight International Journalism Award by the International Center for Journalists in 2016, so how is this not a reliable source?.