Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smudge (band): Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
d |
RS |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::{{ping|Duffbeerforme}} How do either of those denote notability? [[User:Drewmutt|Drewmutt]] <span style="color:#01B0F0;letter-spacing:-2px">(</span><span style="color:#FF358B">^ᴥ^</span><span style="color:#01B0F0;letter-spacing:-2px">)</span> [[User talk:Drewmutt|<span style="color:#F2813D;font-size:10px">talk</span>]] 20:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC) |
::{{ping|Duffbeerforme}} How do either of those denote notability? [[User:Drewmutt|Drewmutt]] <span style="color:#01B0F0;letter-spacing:-2px">(</span><span style="color:#FF358B">^ᴥ^</span><span style="color:#01B0F0;letter-spacing:-2px">)</span> [[User talk:Drewmutt|<span style="color:#F2813D;font-size:10px">talk</span>]] 20:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''': McFarlane's encyclopedia isn't a reliable source (nevermind for establishing notability). I'm not seeing the coverage needed. The only chance I'd see is the claim of being signed to Half A Cow, as they ''might'' be a notable independent label (thus meeting #5 for ensembles on [[WP:NMUSIC]], but the Half a Cow article is almost entirely unsourced, and most of the musicians/ensembles listed on their page don't appear to necessarily jive with the claim (and have substantial sourcing issues themselves). I'd need to see a lot more reliable sources all around here. In fact, I'd say a number of these other associated articles probably need some serious scrutiny to make sure they conform with [[WP:BLP]]. [[User:Waggie|Waggie]] ([[User talk:Waggie|talk]]) 23:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''': McFarlane's encyclopedia isn't a reliable source (nevermind for establishing notability). I'm not seeing the coverage needed. The only chance I'd see is the claim of being signed to Half A Cow, as they ''might'' be a notable independent label (thus meeting #5 for ensembles on [[WP:NMUSIC]], but the Half a Cow article is almost entirely unsourced, and most of the musicians/ensembles listed on their page don't appear to necessarily jive with the claim (and have substantial sourcing issues themselves). I'd need to see a lot more reliable sources all around here. In fact, I'd say a number of these other associated articles probably need some serious scrutiny to make sure they conform with [[WP:BLP]]. [[User:Waggie|Waggie]] ([[User talk:Waggie|talk]]) 23:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC) |
||
::'''Comment''' McFarlane is definitely an independent reliable source. [[User:Dan arndt|Dan arndt]] ([[User talk:Dan arndt|talk]]) 02:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:24, 3 June 2017
- Smudge (band) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Severe lack of independent coverage to satisfy WP:MUSIC, a Google News search said much the same. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 02:54, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: I did find a slightly okay reference and added it, but still seems to be lacking. Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 03:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:55, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 06:55, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Entry in McFarlane's encyclopaedia. Multiple album releases through Half a Cow. duffbeerforme (talk) 09:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- @Duffbeerforme: How do either of those denote notability? Drewmutt (^ᴥ^) talk 20:51, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: McFarlane's encyclopedia isn't a reliable source (nevermind for establishing notability). I'm not seeing the coverage needed. The only chance I'd see is the claim of being signed to Half A Cow, as they might be a notable independent label (thus meeting #5 for ensembles on WP:NMUSIC, but the Half a Cow article is almost entirely unsourced, and most of the musicians/ensembles listed on their page don't appear to necessarily jive with the claim (and have substantial sourcing issues themselves). I'd need to see a lot more reliable sources all around here. In fact, I'd say a number of these other associated articles probably need some serious scrutiny to make sure they conform with WP:BLP. Waggie (talk) 23:45, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Comment McFarlane is definitely an independent reliable source. Dan arndt (talk) 02:24, 3 June 2017 (UTC)