Talk:Against Our Will: Difference between revisions
→Lead: tweak |
No edit summary |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Neljack, everything in the lead is a summary of other material in the article. The material is definitely not a BLP violation. The statement, "but many of her arguments have been rejected or criticized by scholars" is objectively true and perfectly easy to support. If you believe that the sourcing should be made clearer, that can definitely be done. [[User:FreeKnowledgeCreator|FreeKnowledgeCreator]] ([[User talk:FreeKnowledgeCreator|talk]]) 02:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC) |
Neljack, everything in the lead is a summary of other material in the article. The material is definitely not a BLP violation. The statement, "but many of her arguments have been rejected or criticized by scholars" is objectively true and perfectly easy to support. If you believe that the sourcing should be made clearer, that can definitely be done. [[User:FreeKnowledgeCreator|FreeKnowledgeCreator]] ([[User talk:FreeKnowledgeCreator|talk]]) 02:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC) |
||
I am trying to update this article. And have been going around in circles. I added info in draft form, got an error message, tried to fix that. Added new material and saved it. |
|||
[[User:SuzeBrown|SuzeBrown]] ([[User talk:SuzeBrown|talk]]) 20:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)SuzeBrown |
|||
My sources are impeccable. I offered a long cite to the material on the summary ad reception of Against Our Will in 1975 but it seems to have been rejected. [[User:SuzeBrown|SuzeBrown]] ([[User talk:SuzeBrown|talk]]) 20:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)SuzeBrown |
Revision as of 20:15, 4 June 2017
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
Lead
Neljack, everything in the lead is a summary of other material in the article. The material is definitely not a BLP violation. The statement, "but many of her arguments have been rejected or criticized by scholars" is objectively true and perfectly easy to support. If you believe that the sourcing should be made clearer, that can definitely be done. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 02:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
I am trying to update this article. And have been going around in circles. I added info in draft form, got an error message, tried to fix that. Added new material and saved it. SuzeBrown (talk) 20:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)SuzeBrown
My sources are impeccable. I offered a long cite to the material on the summary ad reception of Against Our Will in 1975 but it seems to have been rejected. SuzeBrown (talk) 20:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)SuzeBrown
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class Book articles
- WikiProject Books articles
- Start-Class Women's History articles
- High-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- Start-Class Feminism articles
- High-importance Feminism articles
- WikiProject Feminism articles
- Start-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Start-Class sociology articles
- Unknown-importance sociology articles
- Start-Class psychology articles
- Unknown-importance psychology articles
- WikiProject Psychology articles
- Start-Class Gender studies articles
- Unknown-importance Gender studies articles
- WikiProject Gender studies articles
- Start-Class Crime-related articles
- Unknown-importance Crime-related articles
- WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography articles