Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Super Burnout: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Martin IIIa (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Nabisko2017 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 01:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Super Burnout]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, '''[[User:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFFF00;background-color: #0000FF;'>MBisanz</span>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:MBisanz|<span style='color: #FFA500;'>talk</span>]]</sup> 01:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|Super Burnout]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
||
::Not all of the review publications listed at MobyGames qualify as notable/reliable sources; of that list of 12, I count only five that could be added to the article, and that's assuming all the reviews actually exist (MobyGames uses user-generated content). Moreover, as I've said before at AfD, 1990s ''GamePro'' reviews don't help establish notability, since at that time ''GamePro'' reviewed every single game that was released in North America. Finally, to back away for a moment from the tallying of reviews, Super Burnout is one of the most obscure games on one of the most obscure consoles ever released. It was released in minuscule quantities, got a few mediocre reviews, and disappeared without being noticed by anyone outside the hardcore gaming community. It seems a poor basis for an article.--[[User:Martin IIIa|Martin IIIa]] ([[User talk:Martin IIIa|talk]]) 17:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC) |
::Not all of the review publications listed at MobyGames qualify as notable/reliable sources; of that list of 12, I count only five that could be added to the article, and that's assuming all the reviews actually exist (MobyGames uses user-generated content). Moreover, as I've said before at AfD, 1990s ''GamePro'' reviews don't help establish notability, since at that time ''GamePro'' reviewed every single game that was released in North America. Finally, to back away for a moment from the tallying of reviews, Super Burnout is one of the most obscure games on one of the most obscure consoles ever released. It was released in minuscule quantities, got a few mediocre reviews, and disappeared without being noticed by anyone outside the hardcore gaming community. It seems a poor basis for an article.--[[User:Martin IIIa|Martin IIIa]] ([[User talk:Martin IIIa|talk]]) 17:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''Don't care?''' - Many articles were already deleted because of Martin IIIa's obsession (fetish) with the "Proposed deletion" tag. Nonsense. --[[User:Nabisko2017|Nabisko2017]] ([[User talk:Nabisko2017|talk]]) 12:46, 6 June 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 12:46, 6 June 2017
- Super Burnout (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested WP: PROD. No reason was provided by the contesting editor, so I'll just copy-and-paste my rationale from the prod: Fails to meet WP: NGAMES. The article gives no indication of importance, and of the four cited sources, two are simple database information from the same fan site, and two are fan discussion forums. Martin IIIa (talk) 11:30, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. Martin IIIa (talk) 12:25, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: MobyGames lists 12 reviews for this game including ones from reliable sources such as GamePro and Electronic Gaming Monthly: [1] --Mika1h (talk) 12:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per Mika1h. Newimpartial (talk) 15:12, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:05, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Not all of the review publications listed at MobyGames qualify as notable/reliable sources; of that list of 12, I count only five that could be added to the article, and that's assuming all the reviews actually exist (MobyGames uses user-generated content). Moreover, as I've said before at AfD, 1990s GamePro reviews don't help establish notability, since at that time GamePro reviewed every single game that was released in North America. Finally, to back away for a moment from the tallying of reviews, Super Burnout is one of the most obscure games on one of the most obscure consoles ever released. It was released in minuscule quantities, got a few mediocre reviews, and disappeared without being noticed by anyone outside the hardcore gaming community. It seems a poor basis for an article.--Martin IIIa (talk) 17:37, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Don't care? - Many articles were already deleted because of Martin IIIa's obsession (fetish) with the "Proposed deletion" tag. Nonsense. --Nabisko2017 (talk) 12:46, 6 June 2017 (UTC)