Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Case for Latvia: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
CAPTAIN RAJU (talk | contribs) Relisting discussion (XFDcloser) |
Updating nomination page with notices (assisted) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
<div class="xfd_relist" style="border-top: 1px solid #AAA; border-bottom: 1px solid #AAA; padding: 0px 25px;"><span style="color: #FF6600;">'''{{resize|91%|[[Wikipedia:Deletion process#Relisting discussions|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.}}'''</span><br /> |
||
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <font face="Bradley Hand ITC">[[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|'''CAPTAIN RAJU''']]</font><sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 22:16, 10 June 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|The Case for Latvia]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, <font face="Bradley Hand ITC">[[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|'''CAPTAIN RAJU''']]</font><sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 22:16, 10 June 2017 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist --><noinclude>[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|The Case for Latvia]]</noinclude></div><!-- Please add new comments below this line --> |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/History|list of History-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:Shawn in Montreal|Shawn in Montreal]] ([[User talk:Shawn in Montreal|talk]]) 22:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)</small> |
|||
Revision as of 22:21, 10 June 2017
- The Case for Latvia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged as not-notable since 2011. Bringing here for community input. Sagecandor (talk) 20:58, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:06, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 21:07, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 17:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
- Delete because the author is notable, the publisher serious, and the topic intriguing, I tried to source this one. No go. Best I came up with was a press release the year it was published.E.M.Gregory (talk) 23:03, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, since the article tells why the book is notable. Talk/♥фĩłдωəß♥\Work 18:34, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:16, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 22:16, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:21, 10 June 2017 (UTC)