Talk:Ghostery

Archives (Index)

2013 2015 2017 2018 2019 2020

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Ownership

The product an brand Ghostery (c) is now owned by Cliqz International GmbH, a German based company. Ghostery Inc. renamed to Evidon and focuses on B2B compliance services. The German company Cliqz focuses on privacy (anti-tracking) and does not sell user-data of any kind. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 37.120.14.158 (talk) 02:01, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Profitability

What is their business model? how do they make money? 15:32, 2 March 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lingust (talk • contribs)

This question has been posted here for 3 years, and neither Fixanoid, nor — Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.197.242.187 (talk) 03:17, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Is Ghostery Just Another Marketing Ploy?

Just wondering. Since Ghostery is owned by something called Better Advertising is it possible that G actually is a marketing program in disguise and that conflict of interest is why so many are having an issue with its ability to get rid of all the cookies when there are other programs out there that don't seem to have this issue?

http://download.cnet.com/1770-20_4-0.html?query=cookies&tag=srch&searchtype=downloads&filterName=platform%3DWindows&filter=platform%3DWindows

Really, read their blog, people complain all the time that while some cookies are removed many, and often most, are allowed to remain. Just having checked mine, while one cookie was removed six remain. That's not what people download it for. Example:

https://getsatisfaction.com/ghostery/topics/ghostery_simply_isnt_working

So I read:

"It’s important to know that this kind of “3rd party tracking” is not necessarily a bad thing."

"With Ghostery, Better Advertising can provide companies and industry associations with a complete view of OBA usage." http://blog.evidon.com/2010/01/19/better-advertising-acquires-ghostery/

The above link also says that they don't use the info gotten from users to market, but I'm wondering what the true connection between Ghostery and marketers is and why they don't make that clear when hyping the product (after all, they do speak highly about "transparency"). Was the name change from Better Advertising to Evidon an attempt to hide a connection? Other clues are the strange questions when posting to the blog like "How does this make you feel?" which sounds almost like psychological profiling, and "Our employees are here to help". Employees? Understand, I'm not making an accusation but if people knew there was an undisclosed connection to marketers for purposes of tracking and/or advertising somehow I doubt they would be downloading it.

Perhaps someone will say that the connection is harmless and the tracking allowed is necessary for sites to "provide services", yet not only is this allowance of tracking unnecessary but that position is also highly misleading as I believe that most people download it under the assumption that Ghostery eliminates all tracking and is solely concerned with privacy when in fact Ghostery may be more concerned with "better advertising".

It's just the principle of the thing, though we are living in an increasingly Big Brotherish world privacy is still a basic human right not a privilege. Simply put people don't like to be tracked knowingly and especially unknowingly.

By the way, I tried to post a pared down version of this question on their site but the "Choose a topic" drop down menu wouldn't work so I couldn't post. 4.246.203.174 (talk) 16:35, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

You're absolutely correct, it IS the principle of the thing. I, also, was very hopeful that this software would help with transparency and limit tracking. Instead, it seems that they want to choose WHO tracks you, to the benefit of the advertising partners of Ghostery, or whatever the current name of their parent company. They haven't been acquired, it seems, but change their name and explain with doubletalk. Their usage stats are not transparent, nor is their business model, and when I attempt to to disable/delete their software, they act very much like malware. As the man said, "If it walks like a duck, and sounds like a duck, ..." 205.197.242.187 (talk) 03:48, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Criticism Section

The entire criticism section is all based on one article: http://www.technologyreview.com/news/516156/a-popular-ad-blocker-also-helps-the-ad-industry/ . This article was used as reference in the Criticism section. It was republished by mashable and that story was used as a reference in the Criticism section. The article was translated into German and hosted at heise.de/tr and that story was used as a reference in the Criticism section. The article was the sole source of a lifehacker post, and that post was used as a reference in the Criticism section. The German magazine Chip wrote an article apparently based on either the original Technology Review article or the translated version, this was used as a reference in the Criticism section.

The most damning claim against Ghostery came in the lifehacker blog post that claims "[Ghostrank] sends that information back to advertisers so they can better formulate their ads to avoid being blocked". This claim is not expressed anywhere else, and is not supported by the source article.

Every source except for the original technology review article should be removed from this section, and the unsupported claims should be removed. Onlynone (talk) 14:33, 27 August 2014 (UTC)

As the Ghostshare is an opt in were the web user actively has to reveil this information is hardly a risk compared to the unsolicited beakons and trackers. Those are not "opt-in" but come as a wanted or unwanted collateral. Theking2 (talk) 14:05, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ghostery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151222173039/https://www.ghostery.com/support/faq/ghostery-add-on/exactly-what-data-does-ghostery-collect/ to https://www.ghostery.com/support/faq/ghostery-add-on/exactly-what-data-does-ghostery-collect/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:08, 11 January 2017 (UTC)