Talk:Menaka (1935 film): Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 17:03, 29 June 2017

Film: Indian Start‑class

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

India: Cinema Start‑class Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian cinema workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Move to Menaka (1935 film)

The request to rename this article to Menaka (1935 film) has been carried out.

If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag.

There is another Tamil film with the same title released in 1955.--UKSharma3 (User | talk | Contribs) 00:44, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I'd support the move IF the other film had an article. Until then, there's no point. Lugnuts ^{Fire Walk with Me} 06:43, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would have supported this even without Menaka (1955 film) being created if the content had been in the director article. But now it has been, there's no more discussion. Good article by the way, and good source from The Hindu. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:52, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Before deciding, I suggest we need some investigation and subsequent discussion on whether either of these is the primary topic for "Menaka (film)", which is now a WP:PDAB. Is either relatively significant and more likely to be sought than the other? --В²C ☎ 17:03, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 *'''Comment''' I'd support the move '''IF''' the other film had an article. Until then, there's no point. '''[[User:Lugnuts|<font color="002bb8">Lugnuts</font>]]''' <sup>[[User talk:Lugnuts|Fire Walk with Me]]</sup> 06:43, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
 *'''Support''' I would have supported this even without [[Menaka (1955 film)]] being created if the content had been in the director article. But now it has been, there's no more discussion. Good article by the way, and good source from The Hindu. [[User:In ictu oculi|In ictu oculi]] ([[User talk:In ictu oculi|talk]]) 07:52, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
+*'''Comment''' Before deciding, I suggest we need some investigation and subsequent discussion on whether either of these is the primary topic for "Menaka (film)", which is now a [[WP:PDAB]]. Is either relatively significant and more likely to be sought than the other? --[[User:Born2cycle|В²C]] [[User_talk:Born2cycle#top|☎]] 17:03, 29 June 2017 (UTC)