User talk:Vaibhav.kr: Difference between revisions
Vaibhav.kr (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Vaibhav.kr (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 77: | Line 77: | ||
:::[[User: Deepak.kumar8744]] and this account were simultaneously blocked as sockpuppets (or possibly [[WP:MEAT|meatpuppets]]) of [[User:Ramanuj Bhatnagar]]; the reason the latter was considered the master is merely account age. Your defense is, "Yes, I engaged in sockpuppetry, but I'm not a sock of that user". I'd take the "colleague in my office" reference above as admission of violating the [[WP:PAID|Terms of Use]] too, by being a paid editor who has not disclosed the relevant information. Whether or not you are associated with Bhatnagar (and I'd say there's ample behavioural evidence that you are), ''your'' conduct clearly violates multiple policies, including [[WP:SOCK]] (see particularly [[WP:COWORKER]]). [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 12:22, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
:::[[User: Deepak.kumar8744]] and this account were simultaneously blocked as sockpuppets (or possibly [[WP:MEAT|meatpuppets]]) of [[User:Ramanuj Bhatnagar]]; the reason the latter was considered the master is merely account age. Your defense is, "Yes, I engaged in sockpuppetry, but I'm not a sock of that user". I'd take the "colleague in my office" reference above as admission of violating the [[WP:PAID|Terms of Use]] too, by being a paid editor who has not disclosed the relevant information. Whether or not you are associated with Bhatnagar (and I'd say there's ample behavioural evidence that you are), ''your'' conduct clearly violates multiple policies, including [[WP:SOCK]] (see particularly [[WP:COWORKER]]). [[User:Huon|Huon]] ([[User talk:Huon|talk]]) 12:22, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
||
⚫ | |||
:::Hi, |
|||
⚫ | |||
2. I am not saying I am sock, I am saying I was fetching help from Mr. Deepak on research of the topics. |
2. I am not saying I am sock, I am saying I was fetching help from Mr. Deepak on research of the topics. |
||
3. I am not paid Information, I don't work in company of which I was editing the article. |
3. I am not paid Information, I don't work in company of which I was editing the article. |
||
4. I haven't read about [[WP:COWORKER]] earlier but now since I know I will folow the thing. Kindly provide definate ban indtead of indefinate ban, If you believe I am in sockpuppetry (Which I am not). After this humiliation I am not editinganything in future on Wiki but I don't want any bad name in this community with blocked account.[[User:Vaibhav.kr|Vaibhav Kumar]] ([[User talk:Vaibhav.kr#top|talk]]) 15:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
4. I haven't read about [[WP:COWORKER]] earlier but now since I know I will folow the thing. Kindly provide definate ban indtead of indefinate ban, If you believe I am in sockpuppetry (Which I am not). After this humiliation I am not editinganything in future on Wiki but I don't want any bad name in this community with blocked account. Thanks.[[User:Vaibhav.kr|Vaibhav Kumar]] ([[User talk:Vaibhav.kr#top|talk]]) 15:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:14, 2 July 2017
|
Namaste
I welcome you to my talk page!
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
Vaibhav.kr, you are invited to the Teahouse!
Hi Vaibhav.kr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 19 March 2017 (UTC) |
Welcome
Welcome to wikipedia. Hope you will enjoy editing. 103.3.206.154 (talk) 16:47, 19 March 2017 (UTC)
Re-initiating INCOTM
It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Re-initiating INCOTM
It's been almost an year since "Indian collaboration of the month" was active. Firstly we need to restart this as soon as possible for development of India-related articles to greater heights. The members page was blanked, where many of them are inactive. This mass message is to all the members of WikiProject India, about this and interested editors interested will sign up. After this message gets delivered, we'll wait for 7 days before we start a discussion under a thread on the collaboration's talk page, among the members. The discussion will include what to clean-up of sub-pages, a new set of guidelines for smooth and uninterrupted functioning of the collaboration etc. Please keep all the discussions under this thread only, so that it will easier for future reference. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Invitation to join the Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Incubator/Indian military history
You are invited to join the Indian military history work-group, an initiative of the Military history WikiProject. This group is to exclusively deal with the topics related to Indian military. If you're interested, please add you name to the participants list. Ignore if you are already a member. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Indian defence services
You are requested to participate in the discussion of Wiki Loves Indian defence services on the talk page of WikiProject India. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:44, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Discussion to restart Indian collaborations of the month.
A discussion on INCOTM's talk page has been initiated. It includes various steps to be taken to keep the project alive and also regarding electing the coordinators. Please discuss. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Could you make a photo in New Delhi?
Dear Vaibhav.kr, greetings from Russian Wikipedia. Could you by any chance provide me (and Wikipedia) a help getting photos of New Delhi locations. More specifically, I've made an article about Indian National Science Academy and it would be good to illustrate it with a photo of the academy main building. I have found a number of its photo in Google but unfortunately, none are "free content" and since India has "freedom-of-panorama" for sculpture and architecture objects - any of them of formally "replaceable with a newly-made free image", so I cannot use them as FairUse either. Do you by any chance have a time a possibility to make one or several photos of this academy and upload it to Commons? (I know that it's sort of rectangular building from one side and X-like from another but I have no idea which of them is considered the frontal view so this is up to you) If you cannot but could advise me whom to ask instead - I'd be also much obliged (currently just checked people with "user lives in New Delhi" userbox and you seemed to be the only user out of these with recent answer on a talk page).
Thank you in advance, Tatewaki (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Hello Tatewaki, Please let me know till when you need the asked images? Vaibhav Kumar (talk) 09:36, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
- Whenever it is possible, will be fine - take your time. The article will not be deleted without illustration, but if you get it - it will become better (as well as WP articles on INSA in other languages). Tatewaki (talk) 12:42, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Ramanuj Bhatnagar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. —SpacemanSpiff 12:18, 21 June 2017 (UTC) |
Vaibhav.kr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is genuine account and I have no connection with any who so ever named. I am following WP:CLEANSTART for user name vkamythand it has been three months already. What extra you need for verification? My ID card?
Decline reason:
Five minutes after you uploadedFile:Credihealth-logo.png it was added to User:Deepak.kumar8744/sandbox. I think you have some explaining to do. Huon (talk) 21:31, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Vaibhav Kumar (talk) 02:05, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
- What does it mean
I am following WP:CLEANSTART for user name vkamythand
? Who is vkamythand? There is no such username. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:44, 25 June 2017 (UTC)- Hi, I meant username vkamyth. Tks.
Unblock Request
Vaibhav.kr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Why it is not possible that two editors are editing same content together? PLease refer IP or mac address of both the edit. Both are done via different system. Also when I said I have no connection with whos ever, I meant with user Ramanuj Bhatnagar. If I am banned for Sock puppetry for Ramanuj Bhatnagar why we are getting referance of Deepak Kumar here? Please clear me which account/s you think is my multiple accounts and whhich account you believe is main account. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Why it is not possible that two editors are editing same content together? PLease refer IP or mac address of both the edit. Both are done via different system. Also when I said I have no connection with whos ever, I meant with user Ramanuj Bhatnagar. If I am banned for Sock puppetry for Ramanuj Bhatnagar why we are getting referance of Deepak Kumar here? Please clear me which account/s you think is my multiple accounts and whhich account you believe is main account. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Why it is not possible that two editors are editing same content together? PLease refer IP or mac address of both the edit. Both are done via different system. Also when I said I have no connection with whos ever, I meant with user Ramanuj Bhatnagar. If I am banned for Sock puppetry for Ramanuj Bhatnagar why we are getting referance of Deepak Kumar here? Please clear me which account/s you think is my multiple accounts and whhich account you believe is main account. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
- Please explain your connection with Deepak Kumar. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:36, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, Deepak Kumar is a colleague in my office. He was just helping me in editing and fetching information about wikipedia page I was working on.
- User: Deepak.kumar8744 and this account were simultaneously blocked as sockpuppets (or possibly meatpuppets) of User:Ramanuj Bhatnagar; the reason the latter was considered the master is merely account age. Your defense is, "Yes, I engaged in sockpuppetry, but I'm not a sock of that user". I'd take the "colleague in my office" reference above as admission of violating the Terms of Use too, by being a paid editor who has not disclosed the relevant information. Whether or not you are associated with Bhatnagar (and I'd say there's ample behavioural evidence that you are), your conduct clearly violates multiple policies, including WP:SOCK (see particularly WP:COWORKER). Huon (talk) 12:22, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hi, 1. I again don't know any Bhatnagar.
- User: Deepak.kumar8744 and this account were simultaneously blocked as sockpuppets (or possibly meatpuppets) of User:Ramanuj Bhatnagar; the reason the latter was considered the master is merely account age. Your defense is, "Yes, I engaged in sockpuppetry, but I'm not a sock of that user". I'd take the "colleague in my office" reference above as admission of violating the Terms of Use too, by being a paid editor who has not disclosed the relevant information. Whether or not you are associated with Bhatnagar (and I'd say there's ample behavioural evidence that you are), your conduct clearly violates multiple policies, including WP:SOCK (see particularly WP:COWORKER). Huon (talk) 12:22, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
2. I am not saying I am sock, I am saying I was fetching help from Mr. Deepak on research of the topics. 3. I am not paid Information, I don't work in company of which I was editing the article. 4. I haven't read about WP:COWORKER earlier but now since I know I will folow the thing. Kindly provide definate ban indtead of indefinate ban, If you believe I am in sockpuppetry (Which I am not). After this humiliation I am not editinganything in future on Wiki but I don't want any bad name in this community with blocked account. Thanks.Vaibhav Kumar (talk) 15:13, 2 July 2017 (UTC)