Jump to content

Talk:Origin Energy: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
BU RoBOT (talk | contribs)
m top: Auto-assessment of article class. Editors are encouraged to manually assess articles. See User:BU_RoBOT/autoassess for more info.
MarekJG (talk | contribs)
Line 66: Line 66:


Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 16:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:Cyberbot II|<sup style="color:green;font-family:Courier">cyberbot II</sup>]]<small><sub style="margin-left:-14.9ex;color:green;font-family:Comic Sans MS">[[User talk:Cyberbot II|<span style="color:green">Talk to my owner</span>]]:Online</sub></small> 16:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)

== Solar cell production ==

Should this line be completely removed from the article:

"A solar energy business using solar cell technology invented by a team led by Professor Andrew Blakers at The Australian National University.[15] Origin Energy expected to be manufacturing its sliver cell technology for the Australian market by 2008.[16]"

The citation to ANU no longer mentions the project.
The business referred to is this one: https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=46887828
The business was wound up in 2015 https://insolvencynotices.asic.gov.au/browsesearch-notices/notice-details/TRANSFORM-SOLAR-PTY-LTD-104067147/1652ec84-1cb3-45c7-a5dd-952277690f6e

From my research it looks like this was never a significant part of the business (probably more of a marketing program). Should the mention of it be removed completely or should the history be explored in more depth. My concern about expanding is that it will make the word count higher and it will look like this was a more major project than it appears to be.[[User:MarekJG|MarekJG]] ([[User talk:MarekJG|talk]]) 06:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 06:23, 3 July 2017

Fair use rationale for Image:Originenergy.jpg

Image:Originenergy.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:45, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Origin Energy logo.jpg

Image:Origin Energy logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 02:29, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wind Farms

Origin has equity in Australian wind farms now.

Origin purchased Wind Power Pty Ltd http://business.theage.com.au/business/origin-buys-up-wind-power-20090507-avpv.html http://www.originenergy.com.au/news/article/asxmedia-releases/1021

Origin is currently building the Cullerin Range Wind Farm http://www.originenergy.com.au/593/Cullerin-Range-wind-farm

I'm submitting this info from an Origin IP, so I won't make edits to the main page. Others are welcome to check out the links and amend as appropriate.

Wind Farms

Origin has equity in Australian wind farms now.

Origin purchased Wind Power Pty Ltd http://business.theage.com.au/business/origin-buys-up-wind-power-20090507-avpv.html http://www.originenergy.com.au/news/article/asxmedia-releases/1021

Origin is currently building the Cullerin Range Wind Farm http://www.originenergy.com.au/593/Cullerin-Range-wind-farm

I'm submitting this info from an Origin IP, so I won't make edits to the main page. Others are welcome to check out the links and amend as appropriate. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.20.195.54 (talk) 02:38, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

19th century reference

Where is the information pertaining to the reference of "parts of the business date from the 19th century"? Which parts? Boral itself was founded in 1946 according to the Boral article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.171.241.237 (talk) 09:08, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Origin Energy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 16:44, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Solar cell production

Should this line be completely removed from the article:

"A solar energy business using solar cell technology invented by a team led by Professor Andrew Blakers at The Australian National University.[15] Origin Energy expected to be manufacturing its sliver cell technology for the Australian market by 2008.[16]"

The citation to ANU no longer mentions the project. The business referred to is this one: https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/private/snapshot.asp?privcapId=46887828 The business was wound up in 2015 https://insolvencynotices.asic.gov.au/browsesearch-notices/notice-details/TRANSFORM-SOLAR-PTY-LTD-104067147/1652ec84-1cb3-45c7-a5dd-952277690f6e

From my research it looks like this was never a significant part of the business (probably more of a marketing program). Should the mention of it be removed completely or should the history be explored in more depth. My concern about expanding is that it will make the word count higher and it will look like this was a more major project than it appears to be.MarekJG (talk) 06:23, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]