Jump to content

Talk:Collusion: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:32, 17 July 2017

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Business High‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Economics High‑importance

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Game theory Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Game theory, an attempt to improve, grow, and standardize Wikipedia's articles related to Game theory. We need your help! Join in \| Fix a red link \| Add content \| Weigh inGame theoryWikipedia:WikiProject Game theoryTemplate:WikiProject Game theorygame theory
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Law Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives (Index)
2012 2013 2015 2016 2017 2021
This page is archived by ClueBot III.

FIFA corruption

Should the FIFA corruption conspiracy be added to the "Examples" section? --Mr. Guye (talk) 21:52, 31 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dr. Bigoni's comment on this article

Dr. Bigoni has reviewed this Wikipedia page, and provided us with the following comments to improve its quality:

Collusion which is overt, on the other hand, is known as tacit collusion, and is legal. The meaning of "overt" here is not clear. It is true that collusion is not based on explicit agreements is not illegal.

We hope Wikipedians on this talk page can take advantage of these comments and improve the quality of the article accordingly.

Dr. Bigoni has published scholarly research which seems to be relevant to this Wikipedia article:

Reference : Bigoni, Maria & Fridolfsson, Sven-Olof & Le Coq, Chloe & Spagnolo, Giancarlo, 2014. "Trust, Leniency and Deterrence�," Konkurrensverket Working Paper Series in Law and Economics 2014:2, Konkurrensverket (Swedish Competition Authority).

ExpertIdeasBot (talk) 18:36, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Examples not being in context with the article

Donald Trump Jr. and Russia: "On 9 July came news of what was thought to be the first confirmed private meeting between a Russian national and members of President Trump's inner circle" in an attempt to collude against Hillary Clinton's election and against the democracy of the United States of America. "The president's son, Donald Trump Jr, admitted meeting Russian lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya on 9 June 2016 after being told that she had damaging material on Hillary Clinton."[4]

My interpretation of the definition of collusion by this very article doesn't match the written information nor the definition in the sourced material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.89.48.116 (talk) 21:17, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The BBC article does actually talk about collusion, once: President Trump has repeatedly denied any collusion with Russia, calling the allegations a "witch hunt", it states. So this is paraphrasing and interpreting Trump's actions as collusion, which means that this part of the article does have a leg to stand on. ^My^name ^isnot^dave (talk/contribs) 18:44, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This example is still out of context with the rest of the page. The entirety of this page, except the example of Trump Jr., is discussing economic and financial collusion only. Campaign malfeasance and things of that nature have separate pages where this example would clearly fit better. A news site like BBC simply labeling it collusion does not automatically make it true, or relevant to the page. BBC is free to label Trump Jr. whatever they like, that does not make it legally correct without an indictment, at the very least. For example, they're free to print an article that states Trump is a horse, but clearly he would not be mentioned in page about horses just because of it. Including Trump Jr. in this page is out of place and comes off as too partisan for Wikipedia. If the entirety of the article was re-written and the scope was broadened to include political collusion, then a case could be made to include this example. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.160.14.62 (talk) 15:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protected edit request on 16 July 2017

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Streak986 (talk) 23:38, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk) 01:25, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Collusion&oldid=791013895"

Hidden category:

WikiProject banners with class parameter that needs moving to banner shell