Jump to content

Talk:Lost in Oz (TV pilot): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Updated classification
Old AFD – 8 July 2017: redirect (XFDcloser)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Old AfD multi |date=8 July 2017 |result='''redirect''' |page=Lost in Oz}}
{{Oz-project|class=stub}}
{{Oz-project|class=stub}}
{{WikiProject Television|episode-coverage=Yes|class=stub|importance=low}}
{{WikiProject Television|episode-coverage=Yes|class=stub|importance=low}}

Revision as of 19:36, 23 July 2017

WikiProject iconOz (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Oz, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OzWikipedia:WikiProject OzTemplate:WikiProject OzOz
WikiProject iconTelevision: Episode coverage Redirect‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This redirect is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

“For no reason”? Surely “but the reason is presently unknown”. There's a bit of a difference between not knowing a reason and there not being one at all! Nevalicori 14:53, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sources?

Was this discussed in any media — perhaps in a magazine like Starlog, or some Oz fan publication? If anyone knows of any reliable sources discussing this pilot, please add references to them in the article. Thanks. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 02:05, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The YouTube page containing the Lost in Oz pilot claims, "The LOST IN OZ pilot is believed to be public domain as it was never released, and possibly unfinished, thus uncopyrighted." That sounds legally dubious to me — surely the company that made the pilot would retain copyright, whether the program was released or not. IANAL, but I think that manuscripts have copyright whether they're published or not, and I would assume that the same thing was true of television pilots.

WP:COPYRIGHT#Linking to copyrighted works says that we shouldn't knowingly link to pages carrying illegal copyright violations. The YouTube site claims that it's OK, so I won't remove the link now — but if someone who knows copyright law comes along and says that it's a copyvio, it'll have to go. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 02:11, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I asked at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems#Unreleased television pilot: public domain?, and they said that just because it wasn't completed or aired doesn't mean that it isn't copyrighted. So we have to remove the link. Sorry. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 03:27, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lost_in_Oz_(TV_pilot)&oldid=791993177"