Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Custodes: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 06:52, 28 November 2004

Custodes

"An award winning wedpage" apparently. <corrected by Wifki 06:52, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)> Funny, I'd expect such an award winning site to have more than two sites linking to it (one of which is the author's Yahoo profile). Delete. David Johnson 01:42, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Why? (<---comment from User:MrWoodpigeon)

Because it's not notable by any objective measure and doesn't deserve an encyclopedia entry? Delete. --Calton 02:38, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Okay, fair enough. Didn't know that as I'm a newbie here and thought I'd try my hand at one entry. Ok peeps? Want to listen to Rizgar's Blamwellamum of Woont now? Keep--Mr Woodpigeon 03:08, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Holy Beet, Batman, Delete. DCEdwards1966 05:09, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 ===[[Custodes]]===
-"An award winning webpage" apparently. Funny, I'd expect such an award winning site to have more than [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22custodes.tripod.%2Bcom%22 two sites linking to it] (one of which is the author's Yahoo profile). '''Delete'''. [[User:David Johnson|David Johnson]] 01:42, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
+"An award winning wedpage" apparently. <corrected by [[User:Wifki|Wifki]] 06:52, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)> Funny, I'd expect such an award winning site to have more than [http://www.google.com/search?q=%22custodes.tripod.%2Bcom%22 two sites linking to it] (one of which is the author's Yahoo profile). '''Delete'''. [[User:David Johnson|David Johnson]] 01:42, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 Why? (<---comment from [[User:MrWoodpigeon]])