Wikipedia:Featured article review/Air Force One/archive3: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:49, 3 October 2006

Air Force One

This article is well written, but it fails FA criterion 1c. There isn't a SINGLE sourced statement in the article. This seems to be common for articles that gained FA status back in '04, and as such I'm listing it here. ♠ SG →Talk 13:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. No citations, doesn't follow WP:LAYOUT, large unreferenced popular culture section, numerous short stubby sections and paragraphs. Appears to have deteriorated over time. (the other SG --> Sandy 13:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC) )[reply]

Messages left at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft and User talk:Neutrality. Marskell 13:49, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 This article is well written, but it fails FA criterion 1c. There isn't a SINGLE sourced statement in the article. This seems to be common for articles that gained FA status back in '04, and as such I'm listing it here. [[User:SG|♠ SG]] [[User talk:SG|→Talk]] 13:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Comment'''.  No citations, doesn't follow [[WP:LAYOUT]], large unreferenced popular culture section, numerous short stubby sections and paragraphs.  Appears to have deteriorated over time. (the other SG -->  [[User:SandyGeorgia|Sandy]] 13:48, 3 October 2006 (UTC) )
+:''Messages left at [[Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Aircraft]] and [[User talk:Neutrality]].'' [[User:Marskell|Marskell]] 13:49, 3 October 2006 (UTC)