Talk:Alex Parrish: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Transcluding GA review |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA nominee|10:27, 7 July 2017 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Krish!|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:Red">'''''Krish'''''</span>]] | [[User talk:Krish!|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:Black">'''''Talk'''''</span>]]|page=1|subtopic=Television|status=|note=}} |
{{GA nominee|10:27, 7 July 2017 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:Krish!|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:Red">'''''Krish'''''</span>]] | [[User talk:Krish!|<span style="font-variant:small-caps;color:Black">'''''Talk'''''</span>]]|page=1|subtopic=Television|status=onreview|note=}} |
||
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
{{WikiProject banner shell|1= |
||
{{WikiProject Fictional characters|class=start}} |
{{WikiProject Fictional characters|class=start}} |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
{{GOCE|user=Corinne|date=5 July 2017}} |
{{GOCE|user=Corinne|date=5 July 2017}} |
||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Talk:Alex Parrish/GA1}} |
Revision as of 17:01, 29 July 2017
Alex Parrish is currently a Television good article nominee. Nominated by Krish at 10:27, 7 July 2017 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Alex Parrish/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Numerounovedant (talk · contribs) 16:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
I'll put up comments soon. NumerounovedantTalk 16:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
- Prose
- You could avoid repetiton of American in the opening paragraph.
- Same with FBI, I believe the the "FBI recruit" can simply be "recruit" as the mention of the "FBI Academy" makes it obvious.
- "U.S intelligence"
- I prefer "on and off relationship" as it is lest colloquial.
- "as a completely white character" - completely seems to be an odd choice of words.
- Not sure what a "talent holding deal" is.
- "For her performance as Parrish" - odd phrasing, also, be consistent with use of "Alex" or "Parish" in the article.
Looking at the rest. NumerounovedantTalk 16:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
- The article
could do withoutuse a lot of trimming, as it has a lot of the lengthy direct quotes, in the production section in particular. NumerounovedantTalk 17:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- Removed few long quotes and trimmed others.Krish | Talk 02:27, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Some other concerns :
- "talent holding deal" - not sure what this means.
- "Apart from being the lead in an American series and working in Hollywood" - rather unnecessary.
- "Having never auditioned in Bollywood" - same.
- "that ABC was doing for the 2015–2016 television season" - doing a script?
- "the show became all about her" - sound encyclopedia like at all?
- "as a flawed human being who takes charge of her own life" - same.
- "becoming the lead character" - repetitive.
- "Alex is the focal point and the protagonist of the series" - I think the reader gets it by now.
- For the reception section you might want to restructure the paragraphs, each of which could begin with a one line summary of what it talk about.
- Some other concerns :
I an sorry it took me s long, but this was the first thing I looked at on coming back. There are some obvious neutrality concerns, I hope you re-read it and make necessary changes to make it read more in a more encyclopedia-like fashion. Ping me if you have questions, but you want to go through te article once more. I will re-read once you're done addressing my comments. NumerounovedantTalk 17:32, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
- @Numerounovedant: You can take a look now.Krish | Talk 02:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)
- Final Comments
The article needs some cleanup and formatting fixes, but I'll take care of that. Other than that, it looks fine to me. Good job Krish!. It's a Pass. NumerounovedantTalk 10:43, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- Start-Class fictional character articles
- WikiProject Fictional characters articles
- Start-Class television articles
- Low-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- Start-Class WikiProject Women articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors