Talk:Michael Capponi: Difference between revisions
→Message from Dovelandsb: new section |
Dovelandsb (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
*This is the right place to request assistance for article changes; as a paid contributor representing the subject, your involvement in editing the article must be minimal. That there are long term problems is evident from the overall promotional tone and name dropping in the article. Re: the content you find objectionable, much of it is well sourced, so the origin of its inclusion here is irrelevant, as long as the content is presented in a neutral manner and is not unduly emphasized. I've referred this to the BLP noticeboard as well, to gain additional attention and assistance. [[WP:RELIABLE]] sources are the foundation of content--merely stating that content is false, in bold faced print, won't gain much traction. Thank you, [[Special:Contributions/2601:188:180:11F0:C154:1F1A:21D8:7E70|2601:188:180:11F0:C154:1F1A:21D8:7E70]] ([[User talk:2601:188:180:11F0:C154:1F1A:21D8:7E70|talk]]) 19:51, 1 August 2017 (UTC) |
*This is the right place to request assistance for article changes; as a paid contributor representing the subject, your involvement in editing the article must be minimal. That there are long term problems is evident from the overall promotional tone and name dropping in the article. Re: the content you find objectionable, much of it is well sourced, so the origin of its inclusion here is irrelevant, as long as the content is presented in a neutral manner and is not unduly emphasized. I've referred this to the BLP noticeboard as well, to gain additional attention and assistance. [[WP:RELIABLE]] sources are the foundation of content--merely stating that content is false, in bold faced print, won't gain much traction. Thank you, [[Special:Contributions/2601:188:180:11F0:C154:1F1A:21D8:7E70|2601:188:180:11F0:C154:1F1A:21D8:7E70]] ([[User talk:2601:188:180:11F0:C154:1F1A:21D8:7E70|talk]]) 19:51, 1 August 2017 (UTC) |
||
Thank you for your notes. |
|||
ONCE AGAIN, I'm not sure how you don't see a COI from the July 14 edits that came from an emissary of Dan Biederman. Please look on the history of that day. The same editor made changes to Capponi's and Biederman's pages. |
|||
SECONDLY, The two items I bring up are patently false. Mr. Capponi did not own a record company with Mr. Paciello, nor did he move his party due to the police. Neither of these have cited sources. The sources that are cited do not say this. |
|||
LASTLY, I am being transparent by letting you know I am helping the subject clear his reputation against a blatant COI. |
|||
Thank you so much, |
|||
--Jacquelynn |
Revision as of 20:08, 1 August 2017
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Message from Dovelandsb
Hello. I am trying to edit the page for Michael Capponi. I am paid, which I noted on each of my edits.
Furthermore, I believe I have accurately explained my edits.
Before beginning, I must note that my client Michael Capponi was in a boating accident with Brooke Biederman. He was not at fault for this accident. Nevertheless, the Biederman family is trying to defame him. If you look at the history of his page, on July 14, 2017, a paid editor added substantial content to his page. This same editor also updated Dan Biederman's page the same day. I am explaining this to you, as the Biderman family has a vendetta against Capponi, which should not be voiced on his Wikipedia page. They are biased editors.
Secondly, as I explained in my notes -- the first change I made involved NO deletions. I just moved his Early Life section down to the bottom, which I have seen done on many pages.
Thirdly, I moved up a few sentences from his Career to Early Life. Once again, nothing was deleted.
Fourthly, I did delete two references -- both of which are blatantly false and even though articles were cited, there is nothing in these article confirming these sentences. They are lies.
- In the 1980s, he promoted roving parties at a different location in South Beach every weekend, to escape the focus of police and regulatory authorities.[1]
FALSE: The parties did not move because of the police. They rotated out of creativity. It was cool to have rotating parties.
- In the 1990s he was close friends with Chris Paciello, a former Cosa Nostra associate and South Beach nightclub owner who was convicted of murder, with whom he owned music production company C&P Music.[2] He credits Paciello with getting him off heroin by sending him to a detox center.[2]
FALSE: They did not own a record company together. Furthermore, this is an attempt to link my client to the "Cosa Nostra, which is defamatory.
I kindly ask you to restore the edits I made. They are within the guidelines of wikipedia. Furthermore, the fact is my client is being targeted by the Biederman family (see the edits/additions of July 14, 2017).
I can be reached at jacquelynnpowers@me.com
I truly appreciate your help. Thank you so much.
- This is the right place to request assistance for article changes; as a paid contributor representing the subject, your involvement in editing the article must be minimal. That there are long term problems is evident from the overall promotional tone and name dropping in the article. Re: the content you find objectionable, much of it is well sourced, so the origin of its inclusion here is irrelevant, as long as the content is presented in a neutral manner and is not unduly emphasized. I've referred this to the BLP noticeboard as well, to gain additional attention and assistance. WP:RELIABLE sources are the foundation of content--merely stating that content is false, in bold faced print, won't gain much traction. Thank you, 2601:188:180:11F0:C154:1F1A:21D8:7E70 (talk) 19:51, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your notes.
ONCE AGAIN, I'm not sure how you don't see a COI from the July 14 edits that came from an emissary of Dan Biederman. Please look on the history of that day. The same editor made changes to Capponi's and Biederman's pages.
SECONDLY, The two items I bring up are patently false. Mr. Capponi did not own a record company with Mr. Paciello, nor did he move his party due to the police. Neither of these have cited sources. The sources that are cited do not say this.
LASTLY, I am being transparent by letting you know I am helping the subject clear his reputation against a blatant COI.
Thank you so much, --Jacquelynn