Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girlfriend (0th nomination): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 00:18, 29 November 2004

I think it is a bit more than a dictionary entry, but if not, why not put it on Wiktionary:Girlfriend? Brianjd
Keep: More than dicdef, complements the article on Boyfriend nicely. (how ironic?) Wifki 07:13, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep agree with Wifki - Drstuey 13:02, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep. Another example of the deletion mania, making everybody lose time on futile debates. --Pgreenfinch 13:08, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

You only lose time if you spend time on a page you hate and enter comments designed to rile people up. Geogre 14:58, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Oops, I'm so sorry I hurted you about the page you love. What about a deletefriend article ? ;-)). --Pgreenfinch 16:26, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Keep. Topic is encyclopedic, not just a word. --Hemanshu 18:12, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep. This expands on the Wiktionary definition in a way that Wiktionary can't. --Idont Havaname 18:38, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep; too expandible just to consign to the Wiktionary. Samaritan 22:54, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Keep, as with boyfriend. -Sean Curtin 23:05, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 *'''Keep'''; too expandible just to consign to the Wiktionary. [[User:Samaritan|Samaritan]] 22:54, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 *Keep, as with [[boyfriend]].  -[[User:Gtrmp|Sean Curtin]] 23:05, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
+*'''Keep'''. Incorrectly listed. [[User:Dr Zen|Dr Zen]] 00:18, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)