Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Luke Shen-Tien Chi: Difference between revisions
m Signing comment by Mike7682 - "→Luke Shen-Tien Chi: " |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:({{Find sources AFD|Luke Shen-Tien Chi}}) |
:({{Find sources AFD|Luke Shen-Tien Chi}}) |
||
This individual does not meet notability requirements as outlined in [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)]]. The one reference, Beijing Review, is routine coverage - there is insufficient significant coverage to establish notability. This page is essentially unchanged from the draft [[Draft:Luke Shen-Tien Chi]], which was turned down several times at Articles for Creation. Creation of the article after the draft was declined is a subversion of the AFC process. There is a likely COI here as well, as the article creator is a single-purpose account promoting this individual and his work. See also the related AFD [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spokenology: You and Me]]. [[User:Slideshow Bob|Slideshow Bob]] ([[User talk:Slideshow Bob|talk]]) 11:58, 28 August 2017 (UTC) |
This individual does not meet notability requirements as outlined in [[Wikipedia:Notability (people)]]. The one reference, Beijing Review, is routine coverage - there is insufficient significant coverage to establish notability. This page is essentially unchanged from the draft [[Draft:Luke Shen-Tien Chi]], which was turned down several times at Articles for Creation. Creation of the article after the draft was declined is a subversion of the AFC process. There is a likely COI here as well, as the article creator is a single-purpose account promoting this individual and his work. See also the related AFD [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spokenology: You and Me]]. [[User:Slideshow Bob|Slideshow Bob]] ([[User talk:Slideshow Bob|talk]]) 11:58, 28 August 2017 (UTC) |
||
Is quite easy when someone quickly look at one article, and defined to delete it. I truly believe Wikipedia is not like that. I think Wikipedia look at the person as a whole being. If we really want to proof is someone notability. The guidelines can never fulfill. In what we have here today a very special case. That we Wikipedia can not truly place, Luke Shen-Tien Chi in to the form. Because he did something that is not in the norm of our present time. I sincerely hope that we all can come and show some love in this place. To protect the progress creation of this moving world. :] |
Is quite easy when someone quickly look at one article, and defined to delete it. I truly believe Wikipedia is not like that. I think Wikipedia look at the person as a whole being. If we really want to proof is someone notability. The guidelines can never fulfill. In what we have here today a very special case. That we Wikipedia can not truly place, Luke Shen-Tien Chi in to the form. Because he did something that is not in the norm of our present time. I sincerely hope that we all can come and show some love in this place. To protect the progress creation of this moving world. :] <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Mike7682|Mike7682]] ([[User talk:Mike7682#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Mike7682|contribs]]) 14:13, 28 August 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 14:14, 28 August 2017
- Luke Shen-Tien Chi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This individual does not meet notability requirements as outlined in Wikipedia:Notability (people). The one reference, Beijing Review, is routine coverage - there is insufficient significant coverage to establish notability. This page is essentially unchanged from the draft Draft:Luke Shen-Tien Chi, which was turned down several times at Articles for Creation. Creation of the article after the draft was declined is a subversion of the AFC process. There is a likely COI here as well, as the article creator is a single-purpose account promoting this individual and his work. See also the related AFD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Spokenology: You and Me. Slideshow Bob (talk) 11:58, 28 August 2017 (UTC) Is quite easy when someone quickly look at one article, and defined to delete it. I truly believe Wikipedia is not like that. I think Wikipedia look at the person as a whole being. If we really want to proof is someone notability. The guidelines can never fulfill. In what we have here today a very special case. That we Wikipedia can not truly place, Luke Shen-Tien Chi in to the form. Because he did something that is not in the norm of our present time. I sincerely hope that we all can come and show some love in this place. To protect the progress creation of this moving world. :] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mike7682 (talk • contribs) 14:13, 28 August 2017 (UTC)