Jump to content

Talk:Rebecca Masisak: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Old AfD multi | date = 29 June 2016 | result = '''keep''' | page = Rebecca Masisak}}
{{Old AfD multi | date = 29 June 2016 | result = '''keep''' | page = Rebecca Masisak}}
{{connected contributor|User1=GlennHirsch|User2=Jessicadally}}
{{connected contributor|User1=GlennHirsch|User2=Jessicadally}}
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|blp=yes|1=
{{WikiProject Biography
{{WikiProject Biography
|living=yes
|living=yes
|class=Start
|listas=Masisak, Rebecca
|listas=Masisak, Rebecca
}}
}}
{{WikiProject Technology}}
{{WikiProject Technology|class=Start|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject Women}}
{{WikiProject Women|class=Start|importance=Low}}
{{WikiProject USA|class=Start|importance=Low|bio=yes}}
}}


== Initial review ==
== Initial review ==

Revision as of 15:36, 29 August 2017

Initial review

I was asked to take a look and review this. On first review, the tone seems a little much like a PR piece, but the information seems to be well sourced to reliable sources which are referenced appropriately. Could use continuing work but seems good. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:27, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I marked this as reading like a (narrative) resume. For one thing, at least 1/3 of the text is a hagiography of the TechSoup organization; does this article really need to include a list of all 33 countries where the subject's organization operates? Or a paragraph-long description of her favorite anecdote (not an anecdote about her, but a story she likes to tell). Much of the content should be excised and merged into the TechSoup article. This article would do fine if it were 1/3 the length. --Anirvan (talk) 06:12, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possible sources for expansion

Here are some materials that could be used to improve or expand the article. Not all will meet Wikipedia's reliable sources definition, but perhaps some do. Please note, I work for Rebecca's organization, TechSoup Global. I am trying to inform a decision about whether this article should be kept, but not casting a vote. -Bajeckabean (talk) 19:16, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for these sources. However I don't think any of them are particularly useful or support Masisak's notability. We need sources that are reliable and that contain significant biographical content about her. I went through all of these sources and I don't think any of them fit the bill. Most of these contain a quote or two from Masisak, not something we'd include in a biography. The only source with significant biographical content is the Almanac source but that does not appear reliable. --Dr. Fleischman (talk) 23:37, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]