User talk:Dammitkevin: Difference between revisions
Dammitkevin (talk | contribs) |
Anoptimistix (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
:{{reply|Anoptimistix}} G2 exists for a reason: test pages don't need to exist. [[User:Dammitkevin|Dammitkevin]] ([[User talk:Dammitkevin#top|talk]]) 12:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC) |
:{{reply|Anoptimistix}} G2 exists for a reason: test pages don't need to exist. [[User:Dammitkevin|Dammitkevin]] ([[User talk:Dammitkevin#top|talk]]) 12:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
I have nominated it for Afd usersify, the page can simply moved to the subspace of the user without any need of deletion. Also I was concerned about editor retention as the page author is a brand new user. Hope you understand, Have a lovely Day. [[User:Anoptimistix|Anoptimistix]] ([[User talk:Anoptimistix|talk]]) 12:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 12:24, 4 September 2017
Welcome!
Hello, Dammitkevin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Sanchi. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Cpt.a.haddock (talk) (please ping when replying) 18:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Kaliachak Riots
Check the citations, they are merely junk links with no real citation existing. Rajat.kalia (talk) 14:16, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
- The citations include The Indian Express, The Telegraph, and India Today. They aren't junk links. Dammitkevin (talk) 14:18, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
Discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Kasay
You are invited to join the discussion at WP:Articles for deletion/Kasay. As you've restored the redirect and reverted again you may want to participate in this AFD. KGirl (Wanna chat?) 17:26, 22 August 2017 (UTC)Template:Z48
madhan (writer)
pls help me to change the page madhan (writer) to madan (writer) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.65.192.84 (talk) 03:41, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
i think you donig right thing wikieditor and thats good choise — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chennaiboys (talk • contribs) 03:58, 23 August 2017 (UTC)
Wiki What?
Thanks for your message. The video you referenced in my edits of T.J. Miller is not promotional but a series whose sole goal is to fact check individual's Wikipedia pages. Thank you
- @Mrazzle: The edits promote a non notable facebook page. Please read WP:RS. Dammitkevin (talk) 11:40, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
The video is unequivocally notable per the Content Rules—T.J. Miller is fact checking his own Wikipedia page; a new page on 'Wiki What?' was not created. The video is merely cited as a verified and objective reference source.
- @Mrazzle: Please cite the "Content Rules" that make this facebook page notable. Dammitkevin (talk) 11:52, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for the opportunity to: Relationship between the subject, the article, and Wikipedia[edit] Dealing with edits by the subject of the article
Subjects sometimes become involved in editing material about themselves, either directly or through a representative. The Arbitration Committee has ruled in favor of showing leniency to BLP subjects who try to fix what they see as errors or unfair material. Editors should make every effort to act with kindness toward the subjects of biographical material when the subjects arrive to express concern. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Biographies_of_living_persons#Dealing_with_edits_by_the_subject_of_the_article
- @Mrazzle: That doesn't in any way make a facebook page notable. Are you admitting that you have a conflict of interest because you are editing on behalf of the article subject? Dammitkevin (talk) 12:02, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Not at all, and it's not a Facebook page. It's a video series that just happens to be airing on Facebook. It's unsettling to think that you are striking revisions without so much as viewing the references cited. I thought the state goal of Wikipedia was "to get it right."
- @Mrazzle: Do you or do you not have a connection to the article subject? Dammitkevin (talk) 12:05, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deletion contested: Ruchita
Hello Dammitkevin, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Ruchita, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: This is a test page created by a brand new editor, usersify would work here. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Anoptimistix (talk) 12:17, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Anoptimistix: G2 exists for a reason: test pages don't need to exist. Dammitkevin (talk) 12:19, 4 September 2017 (UTC)
I have nominated it for Afd usersify, the page can simply moved to the subspace of the user without any need of deletion. Also I was concerned about editor retention as the page author is a brand new user. Hope you understand, Have a lovely Day. Anoptimistix (talk) 12:24, 4 September 2017 (UTC)