Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Polyemmory: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 23:04, 6 October 2006

Polyemmory

Protologism - no Google hits at all, no verification offered. PROD was removed, so nominating here. Calair 01:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete (nominator vote). Googling for 'polyemory' (one 'm') produces seven hits, most or all of them misspellings of polyamory. Note also the first version of the page, which made specific and untrue claims about e.g. UK law, which does not speak well for accuracy of the rest of it. --Calair 01:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Arbusto 01:17, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 01:46, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Mdwh 02:00, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Hello32020 02:59, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Kinu ^t/_c 05:03, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and Redirect to polygamy, then Protect. --Kitch ^{(Talk | Contrib)} 12:15, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Why would you redirect? It is not in use, not a probable misspelling or search term... Keeping it as a redirect gives it way too much weight. Delete, allright, but I don't get the rest of your choice. Fram 13:35, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, term has no proven usage and is an unlikely typo for a redirect. -- nae'blis 13:41, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Maelnuneb (Talk) 14:33, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no redirect. -- Merope ^Talk 14:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom.UberCryxic 19:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely Strong Delete and Redirect to polyamory, which is probably what this is supposed to be. --Mysmartmouth 23:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 14: / Line 14: @@
 *'''Delete''', no redirect.  -- [[User:Merope|Merope]] <small><sup>[[User talk:Merope|Talk]]</sup></small> 14:37, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''' per nom.[[User:UberCryxic|UberCryxic]] 19:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
+*'''Extremely Strong Delete and Redirect''' to [[polyamory]], which is probably what this is supposed to be. --[[User:Mysmartmouth|Mysmartmouth]] 23:04, 6 October 2006 (UTC)