Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Girlfriend (0th nomination): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Girlfriend]]: Have you read the comments above? This article definitely contains more than what is currently in Wiktionary. |
|||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
* '''Keep''' it. Fvw is batting about 50/50 this week. —[[User:Radman1|[[en:RaD Man|'''RaD Man''']] ([[User_talk:Radman1|''talk'']])]] 05:49, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
* '''Keep''' it. Fvw is batting about 50/50 this week. —[[User:Radman1|[[en:RaD Man|'''RaD Man''']] ([[User_talk:Radman1|''talk'']])]] 05:49, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
||
* Already listed in Wiktionary. [[Wikipedia is not a dictionary]]. Delete. [[User:Rossami|Rossami]] [[User talk:Rossami|(talk)]] 01:57, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
* Already listed in Wiktionary. [[Wikipedia is not a dictionary]]. Delete. [[User:Rossami|Rossami]] [[User talk:Rossami|(talk)]] 01:57, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC) |
||
* Have you read the comments above? This article definitely contains more than what is currently in Wiktionary. [[User:Brianjd|Brianjd]] 07:21, 2004 Nov 30 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 07:21, 30 November 2004
Wikipedia is not a dictionary. --fvw* 05:33, 2004 Nov 28 (UTC)
- I think it is a bit more than a dictionary entry, but if not, why not put it on Wiktionary:Girlfriend? Brianjd
- Keep: More than dicdef, complements the article on Boyfriend nicely. (how ironic?) Wifki 07:13, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep agree with Wifki - Drstuey 13:02, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Another example of the deletion mania, making everybody lose time on futile debates. --Pgreenfinch 13:08, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- You only lose time if you spend time on a page you hate and enter comments designed to rile people up. Geogre 14:58, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Oops, I'm so sorry I hurted you about the page you love. What about a deletefriend article ? ;-)). --Pgreenfinch 16:26, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- You only lose time if you spend time on a page you hate and enter comments designed to rile people up. Geogre 14:58, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Topic is encyclopedic, not just a word. --Hemanshu 18:12, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. This expands on the Wiktionary definition in a way that Wiktionary can't. --Idont Havaname 18:38, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep; too expandible just to consign to the Wiktionary. Samaritan 22:54, 28 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep, as with boyfriend. -Sean Curtin 23:05, Nov 28, 2004 (UTC)
- Keep. Incorrectly listed. Dr Zen 00:18, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Keep it. Fvw is batting about 50/50 this week. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 05:49, 29 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Already listed in Wiktionary. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. Delete. Rossami (talk) 01:57, 30 Nov 2004 (UTC)
- Have you read the comments above? This article definitely contains more than what is currently in Wiktionary. Brianjd 07:21, 2004 Nov 30 (UTC)