Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Karoliina Tapiovaara: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
Agricola44 (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Delete''' I can't see that the subject has done any notable work. The book she illustrated is self-published by the editor, see [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anagram16&diff=prev&oldid=790909823 this edit] [[User:Mduvekot|Mduvekot]] ([[User talk:Mduvekot|talk]]) 19:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' I can't see that the subject has done any notable work. The book she illustrated is self-published by the editor, see [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Anagram16&diff=prev&oldid=790909823 this edit] [[User:Mduvekot|Mduvekot]] ([[User talk:Mduvekot|talk]]) 19:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' This is not only "kid's book", it's a fairytale for children AND adults. The writer's book Ikävää, väki? has been two years the most popular in the category of linguistics at eKirjasto (library), and still is. It collects the statistics of all Finland's libraries. Another book, Naaraan, was 14 months the most popular in poems/aphorisms (2nd at the moment). Isn't this notable if the Finnish references are accepted? So you can imagine that Muru ja Puru has many levels. This book has been published last month, therefore I know it's too early to evaluate it's notability. No chartings are available yet. If the voters want to evaluate all the references, site Risto Rekola should be returned - at least temporarily. [[User:Risto hot sir|Risto hot sir]] ([[User talk:Risto hot sir|talk]]) 07:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Keep''' This is not only "kid's book", it's a fairytale for children AND adults. The writer's book Ikävää, väki? has been two years the most popular in the category of linguistics at eKirjasto (library), and still is. It collects the statistics of all Finland's libraries. Another book, Naaraan, was 14 months the most popular in poems/aphorisms (2nd at the moment). Isn't this notable if the Finnish references are accepted? So you can imagine that Muru ja Puru has many levels. This book has been published last month, therefore I know it's too early to evaluate it's notability. No chartings are available yet. If the voters want to evaluate all the references, site Risto Rekola should be returned - at least temporarily. [[User:Risto hot sir|Risto hot sir]] ([[User talk:Risto hot sir|talk]]) 07:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete'''. No sources and no claim to notability. [[User:Agricola44|Agricola44]] ([[User talk:Agricola44|talk]]) 14:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 14:57, 13 September 2017
- Karoliina Tapiovaara (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
An unsourced, one-liner about the illustrator of a book. No improvement two weeks after concerns raised. COI since the article was created by the author of the book. Fails WP:ANYBIO and WP:CREATIVE. I don't read Finnish so I'm listing this here rather than for speedy A7 in case there is evidence of notability out there that I missed. Meters (talk) 18:23, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- It's difficult to find much about the book in question since most sites don't list that ISBN, but according to Good Reads https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/36098415-muru-ja-puru it's an 80-page kid's book published Aug 21, 2017 by Books on Demand. I assume that means it's self-published. Maybe we should just speedy this as promotional? Meters (talk) 18:35, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 18:47, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I can't see that the subject has done any notable work. The book she illustrated is self-published by the editor, see this edit Mduvekot (talk) 19:11, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
- Keep This is not only "kid's book", it's a fairytale for children AND adults. The writer's book Ikävää, väki? has been two years the most popular in the category of linguistics at eKirjasto (library), and still is. It collects the statistics of all Finland's libraries. Another book, Naaraan, was 14 months the most popular in poems/aphorisms (2nd at the moment). Isn't this notable if the Finnish references are accepted? So you can imagine that Muru ja Puru has many levels. This book has been published last month, therefore I know it's too early to evaluate it's notability. No chartings are available yet. If the voters want to evaluate all the references, site Risto Rekola should be returned - at least temporarily. Risto hot sir (talk) 07:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. No sources and no claim to notability. Agricola44 (talk) 14:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)