User:Jsullivan3290/sandbox

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collier_Young

The strengths from this Wikipedia article:

Neutral coverage seems to be written without bias toward a particular point of view.

There is a clear, easy-to-understand lead section at the start of the article.

The weaknesses from this Wikipedia article:

Reliable sources are not used throughout this article.I would go back and properly find reliable sources in order to improve/ make this article a reliable source.

There is not a clear structure with several headings, chronological order, themes. There is no images or diagrams. The lack of images and structures make this very hard to understand. I think with a better picture and improved structure this article would be great.

There is no prominent balanced coverage of many aspects of the subject with important viewpoints from the article. I would add more viewpoints therefore there can be a balanced amount of coverage for the article.

There is a very short lead which means these article could have been written through staggered contributions. The lead is short, you are able to tell it has been written through staggered contributions.

There are a lot of relevant sections missing. This article is not fully relevant. I would improve the relevancy in order to give a true article of whom Collier Young was respectively.

There are no references or citations. Information needs to be cited.

The Reason I am editing:

The reason I am editing the Collier Young article is because it needs a lot of improvement. There is good information in the article but the bad outweighs the good. In order for the article to be great, it would need a lot of improvement.