Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tom Hinchcliffe (political strategist): Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
spi
Line 20: Line 20:


'''Merge''' With Fabian Hamilton article. Not relevant enough for own page, but definitely notable enough to be linked if he is controlling whole media output of a Shadow Minister. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Thingthing11|Thingthing11]] ([[User talk:Thingthing11#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Thingthing11|contribs]]) 14:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)</small> [[User:Thingthing11|Thingthing11]] ([[User talk:Thingthing11|talk]]) 14:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
'''Merge''' With Fabian Hamilton article. Not relevant enough for own page, but definitely notable enough to be linked if he is controlling whole media output of a Shadow Minister. <!-- Template:Unsigned --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[User:Thingthing11|Thingthing11]] ([[User talk:Thingthing11#top|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Thingthing11|contribs]]) 14:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)</small> [[User:Thingthing11|Thingthing11]] ([[User talk:Thingthing11|talk]]) 14:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

*'''Note''': Sockpuppetry reported at [[Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Firefox09101]]. [[User:Cabayi|Cabayi]] ([[User talk:Cabayi|talk]]) 16:32, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:32, 15 September 2017

Tom Hinchcliffe (political strategist) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lacks notability - an MP is notable, their office staff aren't. Cabayi (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 13:32, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Because it doesn't meet the criteria - in this case there's a case to merge with Hamilton's article or it's possible my google-fu is not very good. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 14:47, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:05, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

MergeI propose merging this with Fabian Hamilton as it seems extremely relevant to his page.Pigeon0999 (talk) 10:29, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Anything Hamilton does publicly is directed through him so should be merged

Merge Think a merge with Hamilton would be best as he, apparently, controls the whole media strategy and public affairs of Hamilton's office and Shadow Cabinet positionFirefox09101 (talk) 14:54, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge With Fabian Hamilton article. Not relevant enough for own page, but definitely notable enough to be linked if he is controlling whole media output of a Shadow Minister. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thingthing11 (talkcontribs) 14:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC) Thingthing11 (talk) 14:53, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]