Talk:Smith & Wesson Model 10: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Deon Steyn (talk | contribs) →Template overload: ... |
Mr. Yooper (talk | contribs) added template |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WPMILHIST |
|||
|Weaponry-task-force=yes |
|||
}} |
|||
There is more content here about the M1917 than the M&P. Please create an article for the M1917 and move that there! [[User:Lord Bodak|Lord Bodak]] 00:47, 24 October 2005 (UTC) |
There is more content here about the M1917 than the M&P. Please create an article for the M1917 and move that there! [[User:Lord Bodak|Lord Bodak]] 00:47, 24 October 2005 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 23:25, 7 October 2006
 | Military history: Technology / Weaponry Unassessed | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
There is more content here about the M1917 than the M&P. Please create an article for the M1917 and move that there! Lord Bodak 00:47, 24 October 2005 (UTC)
S&W Victory
I'ved added information on the S&W Victory Revolver, arguably the best-known version of the S&W M&P series. --Commander Zulu 09:41, 21 June 2006 (UTC)
Template overload
Does anyone know of a standard or guideline on the number of templates at the bottom of an article, these 3 seem a little too much? Perhaps if a weapon was used by one army in WWII then fine, but now we have two armies and ".38" weapons... perhaps for starters we can lose the ".38" as it doesn't add mouch does it (maybe replace with a link in "See also"?) --Deon Steyn 13:58, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Consider the ".38" template hustled into a car with dark windows and Ministry of The Interior licence plates ;) --Commander Zulu 14:01, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
- Cool, that looks much better! Now, if only they can make those templates the same width, some sort of an "at least X wide" setting. ~~----