Jump to content

Talk:Ravenous (1999 film): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Requested move 17 September 2017: *'''Support''' per nomination. There are 7 titles listed upon the disambiguation page (with an additional 3 under "See also"), thus requiring an even greater burden of proof for any one entry to lay claim as the...
Line 14: Line 14:
* [[:Ravenous (disambiguation)]] → {{no redirect|Ravenous}}
* [[:Ravenous (disambiguation)]] → {{no redirect|Ravenous}}
– This film is not well-known enough, nor was it commercially successful enough, to qualify as the primary topic for the plain title. Virtually the only identifiable reason I can locate for the 1999 film having the undabbed title is that it was the earliest article to ''get'' created — I can find no strong evidence that it outstrips any of the other Ravenouses in comparative notability. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 18:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
– This film is not well-known enough, nor was it commercially successful enough, to qualify as the primary topic for the plain title. Virtually the only identifiable reason I can locate for the 1999 film having the undabbed title is that it was the earliest article to ''get'' created — I can find no strong evidence that it outstrips any of the other Ravenouses in comparative notability. [[User:Bearcat|Bearcat]] ([[User talk:Bearcat|talk]]) 18:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
*'''Support''' per nomination. There are 7 titles listed upon the disambiguation page (with an additional 3 under "See also"), thus requiring an even greater burden of proof for any one entry to lay claim as the primary topic.[[User:Roman Spinner| &mdash;Roman Spinner]] <small>[[User talk:Roman Spinner|(talk)(contribs)]]</small> 20:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:00, 18 September 2017

Requested move 17 September 2017

– This film is not well-known enough, nor was it commercially successful enough, to qualify as the primary topic for the plain title. Virtually the only identifiable reason I can locate for the 1999 film having the undabbed title is that it was the earliest article to get created — I can find no strong evidence that it outstrips any of the other Ravenouses in comparative notability. Bearcat (talk) 18:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]