Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 September 19

September 19

File:Song Hye-kyo at Little Black Jacket.jpg

File:Song Hye-kyo at Little Black Jacket.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Apettyfer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Dubious claim of own work. Image was uploaded 7 December 2013 but was being posted on internet forums before then. For example, see [1] where the same image is posted 8 Nov 2013. Whpq (talk) 00:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Note that File:Jauregui in 2015.jpg is another image where uploader is claiming to hold copyright, but in that case is a clear copyright violation as it comes from Getty Images so the file nominated here is not an isloated incident. -- Whpq (talk) 00:31, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Come September.jpg

File:Come September.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kedar63 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Violates WP:NFCC. Kailash29792 (talk) 04:43, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Last Forever (How I Met Your Mother).jpg

File:Last Forever (How I Met Your Mother).jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pedrohoneto (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Fails NFUR NPCC #8: it's not used educationally. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:19, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:1965 War the Australian Newspaper.jpg

File:1965 War the Australian Newspaper.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by HIAS (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

The uploader falsely claims that the source is "PAF Museum, Karachi", even when the image is rather obviously taken from a Pakistani blog.[2]

File:Captured Indian Centurion tank in 1965 War near Chawinda, Sep 1965.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by HIAS (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).[3] should also be deleted for the same reason. Even the text in the description is copied verbatim from that blog.

The user has a history of uploading copyright violations on both the English Wikipedia and Commons. —MBlaze Lightning ^T 13:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Hotel and Luxury Housing Project, UAE.jpg

File:Hotel and Luxury Housing Project, UAE.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Asy arch (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Claimed as own work, but sourced to Photobucket. Who took the photo? If uploaders, it should be directly uploaded to Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:00, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:EcoTech City.jpg

File:EcoTech City.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Asy arch (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Claimed as own work, but sourced to Photobucket. Who took the photo? If uploaders, it should be directly uploaded to Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:01, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:User-Douglas-Spencer-at-Picocon2004.jpg

File:User-Douglas-Spencer-at-Picocon2004.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Douglas Spencer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Low res, userspace image, Sourced to a Photo-bucket page which gave NO indication as to the claimed authorship or indication of the license shown on Wikipedia. It was also not possible to actually view the image directly shown owing to "technical measures" implemented by Photo-Bucket on nominally free accounts. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:14, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Will someone tell me where to upload a file which I can personally place in the public domain, a location which will prove acceptable to ShakespeareFan00? DougS (talk) 23:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Jtf cap med logo.jpg

File:Jtf cap med logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Sapph (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused, superseded by File:Seal of Joint Task Force National Capital Region Medical.png FASTILY 19:34, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Privatization Iran.jpg

File:Privatization Iran.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SSZ (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This either needs to be refactored or deleted per the result at Wikipedia:Possibly_unfree_files/2013_January_5#File:Modern_tabriz03.jpg. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:27, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Michèle Morgan in Untel Père et Fils.jpg

File:Michèle Morgan in Untel Père et Fils.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Memoire (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Copyright restored in the United States under the URAA. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Michèle Morgan and Ralph Richardson.jpg

File:Michèle Morgan and Ralph Richardson.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ure (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

URAA restored copyright in the United States ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:53, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Michèle Morgan and Bobby Henrey.jpg

File:Michèle Morgan and Bobby Henrey.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ure (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

URAA restored copyright in the United States ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Ralph Richardson and Michèle Morgan 2.jpg

File:Ralph Richardson and Michèle Morgan 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ure (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

URAA restored copyright in the United States ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 20:56, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:John Franklin Enders nobel.jpg

File:John Franklin Enders nobel.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Materialscientist (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

This photo has a subsisting copyright in the United States because Sweden has long-standing copyright relations with the United States. This could be converted to non-free use for use in John Franklin Enders, but would need to be removed from List of Nobel laureates in Physiology or Medicine ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 21:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Danielle Darrieux in Lady Chatterley's Lover.jpg

File:Danielle Darrieux in Lady Chatterley's Lover.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ure (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

URAA restored copyright in the United States ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:09, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Annette Vadim.jpg

File:Annette Vadim.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Clcx~enwiki (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

URAA restored copyright in the United States ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:10, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Geoffrey Bruce & George Finch, 1922.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Geoffrey Bruce & George Finch, 1922.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thincat (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image published in the US and the UK simultaneously. Per Wikipedia:Non-U.S._copyrights#Source_country, the source country is the "country which has the most significant contacts with the work" according to US and international law. The author is British, so this would be the UK. As such, this photograph's copyright was restored under the URAA. It remains copyrighted in the United States. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:23, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

• Keep The book was first published in US and UK within 30 days (it was rushed into print to help fund the 1924 expedition) – it was actually the same imprint.[4] See Uruguay Round Agreements Act "Works simultaneously published within the United States and a treaty country were also ineligible for restoration, where "simultaneous publication" means "during the 30-day period following its first publication in the eligible country." and confirmed by Cornell.[5] So, the photos may be copyright in the UK but URAA didn't chime in because of the 1923 US publication. Thincat (talk) 23:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oxygen equipment on 1922 Everest expedition.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Oxygen equipment on 1922 Everest expedition.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thincat (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image published in the US and the UK simultaneously. Per Wikipedia:Non-U.S._copyrights#Source_country, the source country is the "country which has the most significant contacts with the work" according to US and international law. The author is British, so this would be the UK. As such, this photograph's copyright was restored under the URAA. It remains copyrighted in the United States. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

• Keep The book was first published in US and UK within 30 days (it was rushed into print to help fund the 1924 expedition) – it was actually the same imprint.[6] See Uruguay Round Agreements Act "Works simultaneously published within the United States and a treaty country were also ineligible for restoration, where "simultaneous publication" means "during the 30-day period following its first publication in the eligible country." and confirmed by Cornell.[7] So, the photos may be copyright in the UK but URAA didn't chime in because of the 1923 US publication. Thincat (talk) 23:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1922 Mount Everest expedition, second climbing party descending.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:1922 Mount Everest expedition, second climbing party descending.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thincat (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image published in the US and the UK simultaneously. Per Wikipedia:Non-U.S._copyrights#Source_country, the source country is the "country which has the most significant contacts with the work" according to US and international law. The author is British, so this would be the UK. As such, this photograph's copyright was restored under the URAA. It remains copyrighted in the United States. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

• Keep The book was first published in US and UK within 30 days (it was rushed into print to help fund the 1924 expedition) – it was actually the same imprint.[8] See Uruguay Round Agreements Act "Works simultaneously published within the United States and a treaty country were also ineligible for restoration, where "simultaneous publication" means "during the 30-day period following its first publication in the eligible country." and confirmed by Cornell.[9] So, the photos may be copyright in the UK but URAA didn't chime in because of the 1923 US publication. Thincat (talk) 23:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1922 Everest expedition at Base Camp.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:1922 Everest expedition at Base Camp.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thincat (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image published in the US and the UK simultaneously. Per Wikipedia:Non-U.S._copyrights#Source_country, the source country is the "country which has the most significant contacts with the work" according to US and international law. The author is British, so this would be the UK. As such, this photograph's copyright was restored under the URAA. It remains copyrighted in the United States. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:24, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

• Keep The book was first published in US and UK within 30 days (it was rushed into print to help fund the 1924 expedition) – it was actually the same imprint.[10] See Uruguay Round Agreements Act "Works simultaneously published within the United States and a treaty country were also ineligible for restoration, where "simultaneous publication" means "during the 30-day period following its first publication in the eligible country." and confirmed by Cornell.[11] So, the photos may be copyright in the UK but URAA didn't chime in because of the 1923 US publication. Thincat (talk) 23:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:General Charles Granville Bruce.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:General Charles Granville Bruce.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thincat (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image published in the US and the UK simultaneously. Per Wikipedia:Non-U.S._copyrights#Source_country, the source country is the "country which has the most significant contacts with the work" according to US and international law. The author is British, so this would be the UK. As such, this photograph's copyright was restored under the URAA. It remains copyrighted in the United States. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

• Keep The book was first published in US and UK within 30 days (it was rushed into print to help fund the 1924 expedition) – it was actually the same imprint.[12] See Uruguay Round Agreements Act "Works simultaneously published within the United States and a treaty country were also ineligible for restoration, where "simultaneous publication" means "during the 30-day period following its first publication in the eligible country." and confirmed by Cornell.[13] So, the photos may be copyright in the UK but URAA didn't chime in because of the 1923 US publication. Thincat (talk) 23:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Noel with filming equipment, 1922.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 00:09, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

File:John Noel with filming equipment, 1922.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thincat (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Image published in the US and the UK simultaneously. Per Wikipedia:Non-U.S._copyrights#Source_country, the source country is the "country which has the most significant contacts with the work" according to US and international law. The author is British, so this would be the UK. As such, this photograph's copyright was restored under the URAA. It remains copyrighted in the United States. ~ Rob₁₃^Talk 22:25, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

• Keep The book was first published in US and UK within 30 days (it was rushed into print to help fund the 1924 expedition) – it was actually the same imprint.[14] See Uruguay Round Agreements Act "Works simultaneously published within the United States and a treaty country were also ineligible for restoration, where "simultaneous publication" means "during the 30-day period following its first publication in the eligible country." and confirmed by Cornell.[15] So, the photos may be copyright in the UK but URAA didn't chime in because of the 1923 US publication. Thincat (talk) 23:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DieForYouStarboy.jpg

File:DieForYouStarboy.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by CommieDuck (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

Cover art not officially released by the artist and/or his label. Similar case to TheWeekndReminder.jpg, which was deleted for the same reason. Music01 (talk) 22:38, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Plain White T's in 2005.JPG

File:Plain White T's in 2005.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Strangerer (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log). 

unused, no encyclopedic use FASTILY 23:36, 19 September 2017 (UTC)