Jump to content

Talk:50 Cent: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Talk:50 Cent/Archive 5) (bot
Line 96: Line 96:


The business ventures section was obviously written by a publicist or representative of 50 Cent. It also contains a lot of vague and non-factual claims. [[Special:Contributions/173.2.64.195|173.2.64.195]] ([[User talk:173.2.64.195|talk]]) 14:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
The business ventures section was obviously written by a publicist or representative of 50 Cent. It also contains a lot of vague and non-factual claims. [[Special:Contributions/173.2.64.195|173.2.64.195]] ([[User talk:173.2.64.195|talk]]) 14:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

== Verifiability of 2015 net worth ==

How can this article state "he was the fifth-richest figure in American hip hop in 2015, with an estimated net worth of $155 million" — and then three sentences later, inform the reader that "on July 13, 2015, Jackson filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut with a debt of $32,509,549.91"??

Those two data points don't reconcile, thus the verifiability of each needs to be enforced to determine which net worth is false.

[[Special:Contributions/75.128.111.141|75.128.111.141]] ([[User talk:75.128.111.141|talk]]) 23:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:37, 20 September 2017

Former good article50 Cent was one of the Music good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 25, 2007WikiProject peer reviewReviewed
July 24, 2007Good article nomineeListed
August 21, 2007WikiProject A-class reviewNot approved
August 25, 2007Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 25, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
July 10, 2009Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article
WikiProject iconGuild of Copy Editors
WikiProject iconThis article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on February 28, 2015.

Typo on 2002–06: Rise to fame" section

Error is on following sentence:

"Rolling Stone noted its "dark synth grooves, buzzy keyboards and a persistently funky bounce", with >>Jakscon<< complementing the production in "an unflappable, laid-back flow"."

Semi-protected edit request on 30 May 2017

Could somebody change "Jakscon" to "Jackson" within 50_Cent#2002.E2.80.9306:_Rise_to_fame in the second sentence in the second paragraph?

173.73.231.193 (talk) 01:06, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Done Cannolis (talk) 02:20, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 50 Cent. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-neutral POV in Business Ventures

The business ventures section was obviously written by a publicist or representative of 50 Cent. It also contains a lot of vague and non-factual claims. 173.2.64.195 (talk) 14:38, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability of 2015 net worth

How can this article state "he was the fifth-richest figure in American hip hop in 2015, with an estimated net worth of $155 million" — and then three sentences later, inform the reader that "on July 13, 2015, Jackson filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Connecticut with a debt of $32,509,549.91"??

Those two data points don't reconcile, thus the verifiability of each needs to be enforced to determine which net worth is false.

75.128.111.141 (talk) 23:37, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]