Talk:Lady tasting tea: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Bluerasberry (talk | contribs) →May need elaboration: yes... |
→May need elaboration: done |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
There could be some elaboration around the "Tea-Tasting Distribution" table as to what how/why column #3 is calculated the way it is, and clarify what "x" and "o" stand for (i.e. if cups c1..c4 have had e.g. tea added last, then x at position 1 means c1 was correctly selected by the lady in question.) [[User:Vromascanu|vr]] ([[User talk:Vromascanu|talk]]) 14:50, 14 November 2013 (UTC) |
There could be some elaboration around the "Tea-Tasting Distribution" table as to what how/why column #3 is calculated the way it is, and clarify what "x" and "o" stand for (i.e. if cups c1..c4 have had e.g. tea added last, then x at position 1 means c1 was correctly selected by the lady in question.) [[User:Vromascanu|vr]] ([[User talk:Vromascanu|talk]]) 14:50, 14 November 2013 (UTC) |
||
:I agree. [[User:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry|<span style="cursor:help"><span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span></span>]] 17:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC) |
:I agree. [[User:Bluerasberry|<span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">''' Blue Rasberry '''</span>]][[User talk:Bluerasberry|<span style="cursor:help"><span style="background:#cedff2;color:#11e">(talk)</span></span>]] 17:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC) |
||
::Done. [[User:Loraof|Loraof]] ([[User talk:Loraof|talk]]) 19:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:29, 21 September 2017
Statistics Start‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Mathematics Start‑class Low‑priority | ||||||||||
|
Great add
I just wanted to mention this is a fun cool article to add. Thanks for doing so! Talgalili (talk) 12:40, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your kind words.I created this add to prevent the appearance that the well-established phrase, "the lady tasting tea" was being used on Wikipedia to promote the (good) book with that title. Having two articles, and a appropriately positive link to the book seemed like a good idea. (As a general policy, private concerns should not be able to seize public or common property.) Best regards, Kiefer.Wolfowitz (talk) 14:52, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- The question is what was the outcome of the test? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.229.171.143 (talk) 23:25, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
May need elaboration
There could be some elaboration around the "Tea-Tasting Distribution" table as to what how/why column #3 is calculated the way it is, and clarify what "x" and "o" stand for (i.e. if cups c1..c4 have had e.g. tea added last, then x at position 1 means c1 was correctly selected by the lady in question.) vr (talk) 14:50, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- I agree. Blue Rasberry (talk) 17:42, 14 November 2013 (UTC)
- Done. Loraof (talk) 19:28, 21 September 2017 (UTC)