Talk:1678 Kediri campaign: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
gan |
m Transcluding GA review |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{GA nominee|17:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:HaEr48|HaEr48]] ([[User talk:HaEr48|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Warfare|status=|note=}} |
{{GA nominee|17:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC)|nominator=[[User:HaEr48|HaEr48]] ([[User talk:HaEr48|talk]])|page=1|subtopic=Warfare|status=onreview|note=}} |
||
{{WikiProject Indonesia|class=B|importance=Low}} |
{{WikiProject Indonesia|class=B|importance=Low}} |
||
{{WikiProject Military history|class=B|B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Southeast-Asian=y}} |
{{WikiProject Military history|class=B|B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Southeast-Asian=y}} |
||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
{{GOCE|user=Twofingered Typist|date=8 June 2017}} |
{{GOCE|user=Twofingered Typist|date=8 June 2017}} |
||
{{Talk:Kediri campaign (1678)/GA1}} |
Revision as of 19:02, 26 September 2017
1678 Kediri campaign is currently a Warfare good article nominee. Nominated by HaEr48 (talk) at 17:50, 11 June 2017 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review the article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor who has not nominated or contributed significantly to this article. This review will be closed by the first reviewer. To add comments to this review, click discuss review and edit the page.
|
Indonesia B‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Military history: Asian / Southeast Asia B‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from 1678 Kediri campaign appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 May 2017 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Guild of Copy Editors | ||||
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Kediri campaign (1678)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 18:56, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
I'll take this on. Parsecboy (talk) 18:56, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- General comments:
- Is there a reason the article has a year disambiguator? There's no Kediri campaign to distinguish from at the moment
- Good point. I looked up the policy and found Wikipedia:Naming conventions (events)#Conventions. For events with no established name, it recommends having a title that has the "when" even when there is no ambiguity with other Wikipedia articles, such as 2011 Tōhoku earthquake and tsunami and 1993 Russian constitutional crisis. It is a useful description, and can identify this campaign from other events in Javanese history that might be construed as a "Kediri campaign". HaEr48 (talk) 19:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- "supranatural" - should be "supernatural"
- Done. HaEr48 (talk) 19:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Is there a reason the article has a year disambiguator? There's no Kediri campaign to distinguish from at the moment
- Earwig's tool is clean
- Sources:
- I don't know that theses are considered reliable sources - has Kemper been published elsewhere? Ideally the thesis would have been turned into a book.
- Good point. I looked it up and according to WP:SCHOLARSHIP "Masters dissertations and theses are considered reliable only if they can be shown to have had significant scholarly influence". I don't think this is the case for Kemper's thesis. I used it because it's in English, but discusses a lot of sources originally in Dutch or Javanese (which I don't read), and because it contains much greater detail about the campaign (because of the thesis's smaller scope) than the more general books. Given the policy, though, I will find other sources for the statements and remove some of them. Please give me some time to do it. HaEr48 (talk) 19:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- What ref should "Ricklefs 1985" be pointing to?
- Done. HaEr48 (talk) 19:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- If Andaya's and Ricklef's newer book aren't being used, they should be moved to a further reading section
- Removed. Probably an earlier version of the article used it, but not anymore. HaEr48 (talk) 19:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- I don't know that theses are considered reliable sources - has Kemper been published elsewhere? Ideally the thesis would have been turned into a book.
- Images check out.
Parsecboy (talk) 19:23, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Parsecboy for your review. I addressed most of your feedback above. Please give me several days to replace or remove the Kemper references, because I need to look up other sources. HaEr48 (talk) 19:54, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- @Parsecboy: All Kemper references have been removed. Let me know if there's anything more I can do. HaEr48 (talk) 06:23, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- It looks good to me - I'll pass it now. Parsecboy (talk) 12:00, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Parsecboy: All Kemper references have been removed. Let me know if there's anything more I can do. HaEr48 (talk) 06:23, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Categories:
- Good article nominees
- Good article nominees on review
- B-Class Indonesia articles
- Low-importance Indonesia articles
- WikiProject Indonesia articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class Asian military history articles
- Asian military history task force articles
- B-Class Southeast Asian military history articles
- Southeast Asian military history task force articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors