Talk:European School, Varese: Difference between revisions
rvt per WP:DENY - sock of User:Euexperttime |
Honestly, how do you make constructive edits to an article, you have just filed for a protection order of. WP:DENY is not a policy its an essay with flaws. |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
{{WikiProject Italy|class=stub|importance=low}} |
{{WikiProject Italy|class=stub|importance=low}} |
||
{{WPSchools|class=Stub|importance=Low|info=Not much here and no references. [[User:Alanbly|Adam McCormick]] 00:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)|move=European School (Varese)}} |
{{WPSchools|class=Stub|importance=Low|info=Not much here and no references. [[User:Alanbly|Adam McCormick]] 00:56, 10 July 2007 (UTC)|move=European School (Varese)}} |
||
== Problems with apparent "clean version" == |
|||
The motto of the European Schools is not "United in Diversity". The closest thing they have to a motto is the European Schools' mission statement as outlined on the European Schools article. "United in diversity" is the unofficial motto of the European Union, not the European Schools. |
|||
The enrolment figures on various articles are out of date (sometimes grossly) and not sourced. |
|||
The European Schools as a whole were once recognised by the now defunct West German government, and not the individual schools. There's no need to mention that on every article. |
|||
The only school that was founded by employees of the ECSC (not the ECSC itself) was Luxembourg, the original "European School", the others were founded by the international organisation the "European Schools" after being requested by the Member State in which they are located, which was founded by the 6 member states that made up the ECSC, but again, not by the ECSC itself. |
|||
There's a lot of unsourced information that doesn't provide clarity on the individual schools (ie their reasons for existing - nearby EU, Euratom, or international institutions etc.) |
|||
Infoboxes seem to be unclear and are not harmonised across the schools. There's no reason to explicitly write in the infobox "all European Schools are considered sisters schools" for example, instead of just stating "12 european schools". |
|||
I have reverted to the last version that has all these details ameliorated. I hope editors can look here. Do I have to explain this on each European Schools article I correct? |
|||
[[User|Marchjuly]] and [[User|MarnetteD]], I hope this satisfies your request. If there are any additional queries or problems you have please let me know. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/103.75.119.110|103.75.119.110]] ([[User talk:103.75.119.110#top|talk]]) 02:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
|||
Please stop, and respond to points on talk page. |
|||
Edit: I reverted because the last clean version does appear to be the previous one, but if you want to discuss that here, then fine, I have outlined my points above. If an editor [[User|Marchjuly]] calls for justification of changes prior to edits on the talk page, and the editor [[User|MarnetteD]] consistently undoes them, using the very wide ranging WP:DENY, which essentially can be used completely at editors discretion to label a user as a vandal or troll, and then not engage with them then how can constructive edits take place, which remove incorrect information. There's a catch-22 at the heart of this. |
|||
Revision as of 03:20, 6 October 2017
 | European Union Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Italy Stub‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Schools Stub‑class Low‑importance   | |||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||
Problems with apparent "clean version"
The motto of the European Schools is not "United in Diversity". The closest thing they have to a motto is the European Schools' mission statement as outlined on the European Schools article. "United in diversity" is the unofficial motto of the European Union, not the European Schools.
The enrolment figures on various articles are out of date (sometimes grossly) and not sourced.
The European Schools as a whole were once recognised by the now defunct West German government, and not the individual schools. There's no need to mention that on every article.
The only school that was founded by employees of the ECSC (not the ECSC itself) was Luxembourg, the original "European School", the others were founded by the international organisation the "European Schools" after being requested by the Member State in which they are located, which was founded by the 6 member states that made up the ECSC, but again, not by the ECSC itself.
There's a lot of unsourced information that doesn't provide clarity on the individual schools (ie their reasons for existing - nearby EU, Euratom, or international institutions etc.)
Infoboxes seem to be unclear and are not harmonised across the schools. There's no reason to explicitly write in the infobox "all European Schools are considered sisters schools" for example, instead of just stating "12 european schools".
I have reverted to the last version that has all these details ameliorated. I hope editors can look here. Do I have to explain this on each European Schools article I correct?
Marchjuly and MarnetteD, I hope this satisfies your request. If there are any additional queries or problems you have please let me know. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.75.119.110 (talk) 02:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
Please stop, and respond to points on talk page.
Edit: I reverted because the last clean version does appear to be the previous one, but if you want to discuss that here, then fine, I have outlined my points above. If an editor Marchjuly calls for justification of changes prior to edits on the talk page, and the editor MarnetteD consistently undoes them, using the very wide ranging WP:DENY, which essentially can be used completely at editors discretion to label a user as a vandal or troll, and then not engage with them then how can constructive edits take place, which remove incorrect information. There's a catch-22 at the heart of this.