Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pietro De Vico: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
===[[:Pietro De Vico]]=== |
===[[:Pietro De Vico]]=== |
||
"'''Withdrawn by nominator''' |
"'''Withdrawn by nominator''' |
||
Agreed, but perhaps needs some work. |
|||
Mistake |
|||
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|B}} |
||
Revision as of 20:00, 6 October 2017
"Withdrawn by nominator Agreed, but perhaps needs some work.
- Pietro De Vico (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I do not believe the article meets the notability guidelines - it is not adequately referenced. Heptanitrocubane (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep "it is not adequately referenced" is not a valid reason for deletion. This actor has appeared in more than 70 films, and per WP:BEFORE, you could easily see the article is linked to an extensive page on the Italian Wiki. Within 10 seconds, I found these pages via Google: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], etc. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 19:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep clearly meets WP:NACTOR with significant roles in multiple films. As noted by Lugnuts, not being "adequately referenced" is not a viable reason for deletion. There are plenty of sources available and a more robust Italian Wikipedia article that an interested editor can use to flesh out the article.--Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 19:37, 6 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Looks an awful lot like this needs a caffeinated Italian speaker, but probably not deletion, per sources already presented. GMGtalk 19:59, 6 October 2017 (UTC)