Jump to content

User:Wwarren2019/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Created a header for future article evaluations.
Line 1: Line 1:
== Article Evaluation ==
== Article Evaluation - Assyrian Army ==

This entry in my sandbox is in regards to the article that I read on the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_history_of_the_Neo-Assyrian_Empire#cite_note-Healy19-17 Assyrian army]. Prior to reading the article I decided to take a look at the talk page first to see if the article was created by an individual or more, and if it was ever vetted through a trusted peer? The peer review process did happen, although with some shortcomings in which the reviewer identified to the authors on the talk page. However the individuals that authored/maintained the article never updated it and the article ultimately received a B rating.

After reviewing the talk page I then read the article itself and found it rather easy to follow with a very good outline, grammar, and most importantly facts. One of the areas that I did find to be of a concern was where a sentence was identified in 2012 as needing a citation but it has gone five years now without every receiving one. I will now take a look into my textbook to see if I can find the text that supports the authors claim that the Assyrian army used psychological warfare against its own troops, in the form of deportation into slavery, to discourage rebellion. [[User:Wwarren2019|Wwarren2019]] ([[User talk:Wwarren2019|talk]]) 01:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)





{{dashboard.wikiedu.org sandbox}}
{{dashboard.wikiedu.org sandbox}}

Revision as of 01:16, 22 October 2017

Article Evaluation - Assyrian Army

This entry in my sandbox is in regards to the article that I read on the Assyrian army. Prior to reading the article I decided to take a look at the talk page first to see if the article was created by an individual or more, and if it was ever vetted through a trusted peer? The peer review process did happen, although with some shortcomings in which the reviewer identified to the authors on the talk page. However the individuals that authored/maintained the article never updated it and the article ultimately received a B rating.

After reviewing the talk page I then read the article itself and found it rather easy to follow with a very good outline, grammar, and most importantly facts. One of the areas that I did find to be of a concern was where a sentence was identified in 2012 as needing a citation but it has gone five years now without every receiving one. I will now take a look into my textbook to see if I can find the text that supports the authors claim that the Assyrian army used psychological warfare against its own troops, in the form of deportation into slavery, to discourage rebellion. Wwarren2019 (talk) 01:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)