Talk:IKEA Catalogue: Difference between revisions
Patrickneil (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Samurai 004 (talk | contribs) Bible not non-fiction... |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
I agree, the fact that IKEA-catalogue is printed in more copies than the Bible surely justifies its own page. If we merge "IKEA catalogue" with "IKEA", we would have to act consistently and merge "the Bible" with "Christianity" right? :-) --[[User:Mailerdaemon|Mailerdaemon]] 16:39, 16 September 2006 (UTC) |
I agree, the fact that IKEA-catalogue is printed in more copies than the Bible surely justifies its own page. If we merge "IKEA catalogue" with "IKEA", we would have to act consistently and merge "the Bible" with "Christianity" right? :-) --[[User:Mailerdaemon|Mailerdaemon]] 16:39, 16 September 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Bible not non-fiction... == |
|||
"...the Bible continues to be the most purchased '''non-fiction'''..." |
|||
The Bible isn't entirely true. Is the Bible the most purchased non-fiction or fiction (or somewhere in between) book? |
Revision as of 10:45, 11 October 2006
you guys can merge it if you like. I saw the little factoid about it being the most published work on earth on TV recently and was wondering if that was true, and something of that popularity probably deserves it's own page.Patrickneil 18:51, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
The colour proofs, not the catalogue, are printed by epson u-chrome printers, i edited out the unnecessary advertising along with the note. I think that the catalogue, as the most widespread book on the planet, deserves its own page-- Rocco
Merging Comments
I think this article (IKEA Catalogue) should not be merge with IKEA. As the article said, it is more popular than the Bible, the most widespread book. It's a world record. So I think it's a very very very very bad idea. I agree what Rocco said(the catalogue deserves its own page). -KMB-ATE1
I agree, the fact that IKEA-catalogue is printed in more copies than the Bible surely justifies its own page. If we merge "IKEA catalogue" with "IKEA", we would have to act consistently and merge "the Bible" with "Christianity" right? :-) --Mailerdaemon 16:39, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
Bible not non-fiction...
"...the Bible continues to be the most purchased non-fiction..." The Bible isn't entirely true. Is the Bible the most purchased non-fiction or fiction (or somewhere in between) book?