Curse of the ninth: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 20:15, 31 October 2017

The curse of the ninth is a superstition connected with the history of classical music. In essence, it is the belief that a ninth symphony is destined to be a composer's last; i.e. that the composer will be fated to die while or after writing it, or before completing a tenth. To those who give credence to the notion, a composer who produces a ninth symphony has reached a decisive landmark, and to then embark on a tenth is a challenge to fate.

This folk-notion persists in popular journalism, and is not supported in musicology or "serious" music criticism. Though composers can indeed be found who died after achieving nine symphonies (the most famous example perhaps being Ludwig van Beethoven), nine is not a statistically predominant total in the history of the symphony. In addition, while some very prominent composers (e.g. Schubert, Dvořák, Spohr, Bruckner, Mahler, and Vaughan Williams) are regularly adduced as examples, several of them are only credited with having "composed nine symphonies" as a result of error or oversimplification (see below).

Beginnings

According to Arnold Schoenberg, this superstition began with Gustav Mahler, who, after writing his Eighth Symphony, wrote Das Lied von der Erde, which, while structurally a symphony, was able to be disguised as a song cycle, each movement being a setting of a poem for soloist and orchestra. Then he wrote his Ninth Symphony and thought he had beaten the curse, but died with his Tenth Symphony incomplete.^[1]

In an essay about Mahler, Schoenberg wrote: "It seems that the Ninth is a limit. He who wants to go beyond it must pass away. It seems as if something might be imparted to us in the Tenth which we ought not yet to know, for which we are not ready. Those who have written a Ninth stood too close to the hereafter."

The difficulties with this analysis are obvious. From Mahler's point of view, the only important victim of any "curse of the ninth" (Mahler is not known to have used the term) would have been Ludwig van Beethoven. Even Anton Bruckner (with whom Mahler had been closely associated) fails to qualify: Bruckner died before completing the work that is now played as his (unfinished) "Ninth Symphony", with the result that his symphonic total is eight if only the completed canonical works are counted – and ten if the list includes the early Study Symphony in F minor and the D minor Symphony now known as "No. 0" – both of them withdrawn by the composer. Bruckner was in fact superstitious about his own Ninth Symphony; but this was not because of any belief in a "curse of the ninth", but because it was in the same key as Beethoven's Ninth.

Franz Schubert's inclusion in any list is similarly problematic. Mahler would not even have considered Schubert to have written nine symphonies, as the "Great" C major Symphony was reckoned as "No. 7" in Mahler's time. And while that symphony is now numbered as a ninth (and was followed by a tenth that remained uncompleted), this reckoning includes the Unfinished Symphony (now numbered as the 8th), and a "seventh symphony" that never progressed beyond an un-orchestrated sketch.

Similarly, Antonín Dvořák's "New World" Symphony would not have been considered a "ninth" in Mahler's time, as the work was published as "No. 5", with four of Dvořák's earlier symphonies appearing only after his death. The situation is further complicated by the fact that Dvořák considered the score of his early C minor symphony lost (it did not resurface for two decades after his death, and had to wait a further 13 years for its first performance). Still another case is that of Louis Spohr, who wrote and completed a tenth symphony and then withdrew it.

Others

After Mahler, some composers used as examples of the curse include: Kurt Atterberg, Elie Siegmeister, Alfred Schnittke, Roger Sessions, Egon Wellesz, Ralph Vaughan Williams, Peter Mennin, Malcolm Arnold and David Maslanka. However, many of these examples have elements which tend to work against the superstition: Schnittke wrote his Ninth and last symphony with his left hand while virtually paralysed and unable to speak from a series of strokes; the authenticity of the work finally performed as an interpretation of his manuscript is problematic. In any case a "Symphony No. 0" by Schnittke has been performed and recorded, so his total should be ten. Alexander Glazunov completed the first movement of his Ninth but worked on it no further for the 26 more years he lived. In an interview recorded at the time of its premiere, Malcolm Arnold stated that he intended his Ninth Symphony (his op. 128) to be his last; it proved to be so, but he was to live for another twenty years, reaching opus 142. Jean Sibelius is not usually cited as an example, although if one were to count Kullervo as his first symphony, the ill-fated Eighth was the ninth he worked on. There is evidence from his correspondence with George Butterworth that Vaughan Williams did not regard his choral cantata A Sea Symphony (1910) as a true symphony and considered his 1913 A London Symphony as his first work in the genre. However, he did not number his symphonies until 1956 when his Symphony in D minor appeared. Concerned that the work might be confused with RVW's Symphony in D (1943), his publisher suggested the new work should be called number 8, since by that time A Sea Symphony had been generally accepted as Vaughan Williams's first symphony, so that when his last symphony appeared in 1958, the year of his death, it was counted as number 9.

Counterexamples

Some counterexamples are: Andrzej Panufnik (10), Peter Maxwell Davies (10), Hans Werner Henze (10), Eduard Tubin (10), William Schuman (10; his first two were withdrawn), Alun Hoddinott (10), David Diamond (11), Joachim Raff (11), Edmund Rubbra (11), Robert Simpson (11), Philip Glass (11, as of 2017), Heitor Villa-Lobos (12, although Symphony No. 5 was lost), Darius Milhaud and Alexander Moyzes (12 each), Vagn Holmboe (13), Roy Harris (13), Gloria Coates (15), Dmitri Shostakovich (15), Kalevi Aho (16, as of 2016), Rued Langgaard (16), Henry Cowell (17), Allan Pettersson (17), Lev Knipper (20), Jānis Ivanovs (21), Mieczysław Weinberg (22), Nikolai Myaskovsky (27), Havergal Brian (32), Alan Hovhaness (67), Derek Bourgeois (114, as of 2016), and Leif Segerstam (316, as of October 2017).

Composers before Beethoven, such as Joseph Haydn (106), Michael Haydn (41) and Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (around 50 to 70), are not considered relevant to this superstition.

References

^ Ethan Mordden, A Guide to Orchestral Music: The Handbook for Non-Musicians. New York: Oxford University Press (1980): 312. ISBN 9780198020301. "Though it is more a song-cycle than a symphony, this was to have been Mahler's Ninth Symphony—but superstition cautioned him. Beethoven and Schubert both died after completing their respective Ninths, and Bruckner died with his Ninth unfinished. ... He thought he saw a way out: give his Ninth Symphony a name—no number—thus leaping the verge unscathed. He could then go on to a "Ninth" (really his Tenth). But fate laughed at Mahler, and he, like his predecessors, died before he could complete a Tenth Symphony."

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 The difficulties with this analysis are obvious. From Mahler's point of view, the only important victim of any "curse of the ninth" (Mahler is not known to have used the term) would have been [[Ludwig van Beethoven]]. Even [[Anton Bruckner]] (with whom Mahler had been closely associated) fails to qualify: Bruckner died ''before completing'' the work that is now played as his (unfinished) "Ninth Symphony", with the result that his symphonic total is eight if only the completed canonical works are counted – and ten if the list includes the early [[Study Symphony in F minor]] and the [[Symphony in D minor (Bruckner)|D minor Symphony now known as "No. 0"]] – both of them withdrawn by the composer. Bruckner was in fact superstitious about his own Ninth Symphony; but this was not because of any belief in a "curse of the ninth", but because it was in the same key as Beethoven's Ninth.
-[[Franz Schubert]]'s inclusion in any list is similarly problematic. Mahler would not even have considered Schubert to have written nine symphonies, as the [[Symphony No. 9 (Schubert)|"Great" C major Symphony]] was reckoned as "No. 7" in Mahler's time. And while that symphony is now numbered as a ninth (and was followed by [[Symphony No. 10 (Schubert)|a tenth]] that remained uncompleted), this reckoning includes the [[Unfinished Symphony]] (now numbered as the 8th),  a "[[Symphony No. 7 (Schubert)|seventh symphony]]" that never progressed beyond an un-orchestrated sketch.
+[[Franz Schubert]]'s inclusion in any list is similarly problematic. Mahler would not even have considered Schubert to have written nine symphonies, as the [[Symphony No. 9 (Schubert)|"Great" C major Symphony]] was reckoned as "No. 7" in Mahler's time. And while that symphony is now numbered as a ninth (and was followed by [[Symphony No. 10 (Schubert)|a tenth]] that remained uncompleted), this reckoning includes the [[Unfinished Symphony]] (now numbered as the 8th),  and a "[[Symphony No. 7 (Schubert)|seventh symphony]]" that never progressed beyond an un-orchestrated sketch.
 Similarly, [[Antonín Dvořák]]'s [[Symphony No. 9 (Dvořák)|"New World" Symphony]] would not have been considered a "ninth" in Mahler's time, as the work was published as "No. 5", with four of Dvořák's earlier symphonies appearing only after his death. The situation is further complicated by the fact that Dvořák considered the score of his early [[Symphony No. 1 (Dvořák)|C minor symphony]] lost (it did not resurface for two decades after his death, and had to wait a further 13 years for its first performance). Still another case is that of [[Louis Spohr]], who wrote and completed a tenth symphony and then withdrew it.