Talk:Whitehead link: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
== Unknotting number is 1, not 2 == |
== Unknotting number is 1, not 2 == |
||
Flip the central crossing [[User:Columbus8myhw|Columbus8myhw]] ([[User talk:Columbus8myhw|talk]]) 19:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:14, 10 November 2017
Mathematics Start‑class Low‑priority | ||||||||||
|
Remove copyedit
- Header added. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 23:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
There's a copyedit tag on the article, but it looks pretty good to me, I'm going to remove the tag. EvilPhoenix 19:18, Jun 1, 2005 (UTC)
Two Reidemeister I moves?
- Header added. —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 23:42, 7 May 2009 (UTC)
Although it's topologically irrelevant, the image looks to me as if there were nearly two Reidemeister I moves applied to the orange loop. Of course the Whitehead link could also be archieved without any Reidemeister moves at all... --Rubik's Cube (talk) 00:15, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- I'm not sure what you're trying to say. Do you have a question? --C S (talk) 10:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
"Discovered"
Not sure Whitehead really "discovered" it; rather, he found its connections to deep mathematics... AnonMoos (talk) 19:29, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
Unknotting number is 1, not 2
Flip the central crossing Columbus8myhw (talk) 19:59, 10 November 2017 (UTC)