User talk:204.126.64.254: Difference between revisions
Posting {{subst:test1-n|Realism}} using VP |
Infrogmation (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 65: | Line 65: | ||
Thank you for experimenting with the page [[:Realism]] on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|welcome page]] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.<!-- Template:Test-n (first level warning) --> A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Realism&diff=next&oldid=81061413 link]. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. <!-- 60--> [[User:TheRanger|TheRanger]] 20:30, 12 October 2006 (UTC) |
Thank you for experimenting with the page [[:Realism]] on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Welcome, newcomers|welcome page]] if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.<!-- Template:Test-n (first level warning) --> A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Realism&diff=next&oldid=81061413 link]. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. <!-- 60--> [[User:TheRanger|TheRanger]] 20:30, 12 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
==Reblocked== |
|||
<div class="user-block" style="clear:both;">[[Image:Octagon-warning.svg|30px|left]] '''You have been [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing Wikipedia for repeated [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]].''' If or when the block expires, feel free to come back, but please make useful contributions instead, and refrain from vandalising or this account will face longer blocks, and action could be taken against the individual who uses it. <!-- Template:test6 (post-block warning) --> -- [[User:Infrogmation|Infrogmation]] 01:56, 13 October 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:56, 13 October 2006
December 2004
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks. Bart133 23:43, 4 Dec 2004 (UTC)
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. → JarlaxleArtemis 01:28, Jun 17, 2005 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- 5 July 2005 21:48 (UTC)
August 2005
Thanks for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thanks.-Loren 01:32, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Joyous (talk) 19:45, August 21, 2005 (UTC)
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Nufy8 19:52, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
Band page
Hi, you left me a message but since you're not logged in, it's difficult to me to reply. I recommend you sign up for an account to make things easier. Anyway, the problem was probably not that the article was small (altho that is generally undesirable, by itself it's not grounds for deletion.) Due to an abundance of editors wanting to create articles on their bands, we have guidelines at WP:MUSIC for what makes a band suitable for inclusion. There are no hard and fast rules, but generally a band that doesn't meet the criteria there isn't going to survive long. If you sign up for an account, you'd be welcome to talk about your band on your user page, whether or not it was considered suitable for a page in article space. Hope this helps. I've replied on your page and mine in hopes of improving the chances of you seeing the response. (If you sign up for an account, you get your own user talk page, and things get easier). Friday (talk) 19:49, 7 October 2005 (UTC)
December 2005
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Titoxd(?!? - did you read this?) 02:51, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -Greg Asche (talk) 02:55, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
This message is regarding the page Nitrous oxide. Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -- xaosflux T/C 02:55, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
February 2006
Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --NaconKantari e|t||c|m 00:23, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. Please note that page blanking, addition of random text or spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, and repeated and blatant violation of WP:NPOV are considered vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may come back after the block expires. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 23:05, 14 April 2006 (UTC)
Please don't cut-and-paste text from other articles into Wikipedia. Unless explicitly permitted, it is a copyright violation. OhNoitsJamieTalk
Your edit to Donald Rumsfeld
Your recent edit to Donald Rumsfeld was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot2 22:40, 15 May 2006 (UTC)
Naruto edit
This is your final warning. Stop vandalising the Naruto page or you will be blocked from further editing.
Please stop vandalizing in George Ouzounian
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to George Ouzounian, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ... discospinster talk 20:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
Copyright violation in John F. Kennedy
The edit you made[1] to the JFK article appears to be a verbatim copy-and-paste of an opinion piece from the Wall Street Journal[2]. That is a violation of copyright laws that Wikipedia cannot accept. --Kbh3rdtalk 03:21, 8 June 2006 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Nintendo DS, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. FrostytheSnowman 'sup? 23:09, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --J.L.W.S. The Special One 02:09, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I'm [[User:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}]]. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on [[User_talk:{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}|my talk page]]. Thank you. Gamaliel 18:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Thank you for experimenting with the page Realism on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. TheRanger 20:30, 12 October 2006 (UTC)