User talk:KAP03

User page Talk page Contributions To Do Email

Glass

Hello, and thank you for your significant contribution to Glass. Unfortunately, the article did not pass the criteria required for GA. However please do not let this discourage you-quite the opposite. The main problem was that the article required too many improvements when you nominated, and you managed to make most of them during this period. So, please continue contributing to it, and I am looking forward to see Talk:Glass/GA2! --Kostas20142 (talk) 10:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Glass

The article Glass you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Glass for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Kostas20142 -- Kostas20142 (talk) 10:42, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Merlin (poem)

Your IP reverted and I just rolled back his edits. You might want to check it. ^{Atsme📞📧} 20:02, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Senglea Athletic F.C.

Dear KAP03, I refer to your messege regarding "Unconstructive editing on Senglea Athletic F.C.", which unfortunately can be considered a mistake. I have merely updated the squad list, which was outdated (from 2000s), respectfully there's nothing constructive or unconstructive about that. Admittedly, I have used sources which I forgot to reference and I would be very glad to list them, however the sources were also not fully updated - I was actually watching the match live so I could take note of the footballers playing. Kindly note that I shall be logging into my username, (which I should have done in the first place) and reupdate where necessary. The team of the article in question, is now playing in a top-tier league and has therefore gained some more notability, thus deserving an updated squad list. 88.203.8.125 (talk) 20:12, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

• @88.203.8.125: I have undone that edit. However, could you use a edit summary on your edits to explain your changes? -KAP03(^{Talk • Contributions • Email}) 22:40, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
• @KAP03: Thanks for understanding, I have noted your suggestion and will make sure to leave a summary next time. Tsum60 (talk) 13:37, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SP:NPF

A tag has been placed on SP:NPF requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 12:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Trick r Treat

If you don't think that my revisions are constructive, we'll just have to disagree, but the dog's name is Spite, not Spike, so please don't undo that change.

Khufu

What do you mean? My edits were fine! I found them at a website about the Pharaoh's of Ancient Egypt. Do not respond to this message Kind Regards, Kachur — Preceding unsigned comment added by WizKachur (talk • contribs) 14:18, 1 November 2017 (UTC)

Can you help me thwart some nonsense, please?

I noticed that you've been working on anti-lock braking system fairly recently; particularly with an interest in merging the motorcycle version of into there. I agree about the merge. Should you and I devise a plan on how to mesh the stuff together?

I have another issue with that article. I just did a whole bunch of corrective work there, tidying the article up from several little miscellaneous errors (mine are the 4 most recent 103... IP edits), and then along comes some bozo who erases all my work and falsely accuses me of being a banned editor! Who does he think he is, reverting my edits and and assuming such a grave label onto me like that, likely without even checking my edit history for evidence? And if he reverted my edits there for that reason, then why hadn't he reverted all my other edits for the same reason?

I don't really want to try to reason with the guy; it seems like all I'd get is some kind of crap back from a rogue editor. And if I revert his reversion, won't he just fight with me until the cows come home? Probably so. I know I could report him, but it seems like IP editors always lose those battles in front of admins no matter what; they are not fair fights, unfortunately. Anyway, what do you think should be our next step? Do you think you could kindly throw a dog or two into the fight and restore my edits, and standing up strong against this vandal with me? Where do we go from here? 103.253.146.206 (talk) 08:30, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Hahaha, you're gonna edit the article about ABS plastic but not talk to me about edits on this (vehicular) type of ABS? 103.253.146.206 (talk) 19:43, 3 November 2017 (UTC)

Using Twinkle with kindness

KAP03, recently you reverted the edits of an IP editor in the articles on magnetism and electromagnetic field. Did you really mean to call his efforts vandalism? Note that Twinkle has an extensive menu of warnings, with vandalism being the default. What you really needed was {{uw-mos1}} (Manual of Style).

Please try to be nice to new editors. This one was only trying to add citations and didn't understand how to do it properly. RockMagnetist(talk) 20:13, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of IOS 9

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article IOS 9 you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of ProgrammingGeek -- ProgrammingGeek (talk) 17:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)

Rescue

Hi. Even though I have edited a lot in Wikipedia, I never understood or had explained to me the rationale behind "rescuing sources" How would one know that the sources were discarded intentionally? Thanks, --Smokefoot (talk) 19:54, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

1000 miles of corn

this is a trophy game between purdue and iowa and I was in the process of putting more information into this page with win loss records longest win streak largest margin of victory and I was about to source my page when I say that it was flagged for deletion. I am a new member here and this is the first Wikipedia page that I have created. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Budde85 (talk • contribs) 00:18, 22 November 2017 (UTC)

I added some souces for my information and I added a generic image to the article.