Jump to content

Talk:Joan Smalls: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Yobot (talk | contribs)
m top: Tagging / Start class in WP Women using AWB (12004)
Line 19: Line 19:


The intro may need rewriting to ensure no POV, peacock words or other MOS-incompatibilities. Am tagging it to advise others and hopefully we can get this situation rectified and improve the overall quality of the article. [[User:Jdanek007|<font color="DeepPink">'''J'''</font><font color="Black">'''Danek'''</font><font color="DeepPink">'''00'''</font><font color="Black">'''7'''</font>]]<sup><font color="DeepPink">[[User talk:Jdanek007|''Talk'']]</font></sup> 05:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
The intro may need rewriting to ensure no POV, peacock words or other MOS-incompatibilities. Am tagging it to advise others and hopefully we can get this situation rectified and improve the overall quality of the article. [[User:Jdanek007|<font color="DeepPink">'''J'''</font><font color="Black">'''Danek'''</font><font color="DeepPink">'''00'''</font><font color="Black">'''7'''</font>]]<sup><font color="DeepPink">[[User talk:Jdanek007|''Talk'']]</font></sup> 05:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
:There seems to be some serious [[WP:OWN|ownership issues]] with this article. Almost all changes made are reverted by [[User:Friendlypete2014]] and IP users. Any attempts to rewrite the article (which was rife is POV/peacock phrasing and other issues) are blindly reverted. Any attempts [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Joan_Smalls&diff=617579571&oldid=617569393 to tag] the article for issues that were clearly a problem have also been reverted. It doesn't matter who started this article. Once you hit "Save", the article becomes property of Wikipedia and ''anyone'' can edit it. You do not get to dictate who can edit the article. The IP users who have been reverting along with Friendlypete2014 would do well to review [[WP:NOTVANDAL]] to see what actually constitutes as real vandalism. Edits you personally do not agree with [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Joan_Smalls&diff=601442858&oldid=601438696 are not vandalism] nor are changes that are made to make the article conform to [[WP:MOS]] and [[WP:NPOV]]. I don't know what "rules" the article supposedly met before but there were serious issues with style, sources and puffery. I have reinstated the changes I made yesterday after they were incorrectly labeled as "vandalism" by [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Joan_Smalls&diff=630362908&oldid=630320972 208.54.45.145]. If anyone has issue with the changes, bring your gripes to the talk page. Blind reverts and edit warring are not acceptable. If it continues, page protection will be sought. '''<font color="MediumSlateBlue" face="Tahoma">[[User:Pinkadelica|Pinkadelica]]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Pinkadelica|♣]]</font></sup>''' 11:56, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
:There seems to be some serious [[WP:OWN|ownership issues]] with this article. Almost all changes made are reverted by [[User:Friendlypete2014]] and IP users. Any attempts to rewrite the article (which was rife is POV/peacock phrasing and other issues) are blindly reverted. Any at::tempts [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Joan_Smalls&diff=617579571&oldid=617569393 to tag] the article for issues that were clearly a problem have also been reverted. It doesn't matter who started this article. Once you hit "Save", the article becomes property of Wikipedia and ''anyone'' can edit it. You do not get to dictate who can edit the article. The IP users who have been reverting along with Friendlypete2014 would do well to review [[WP:NOTVANDAL]] to see what actually constitutes as real vandalism. Edits you personally do not agree with [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Joan_Smalls&diff=601442858&oldid=601438696 are not vandalism] nor are changes that are made to make the article conform to [[WP:MOS]] and [[WP:NPOV]]. I don't know what "rules" the article supposedly met before but there were serious issues with style, sources and puffery. I have reinstated the changes I made yesterday after they were incorrectly labeled as "vandalism" by [https://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Joan_Smalls&diff=630362908&oldid=630320972 208.54.45.145]. If anyone has issue with the changes, bring your gripes to the talk page. Blind reverts and edit warring are not acceptable. If it continues, page protection will be sought. '''<font color="MediumSlateBlue" face="Tahoma">[[User:Pinkadelica|Pinkadelica]]</font><sup><font color="Black">[[User talk:Pinkadelica|♣]]</font></sup>''' 11:56, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
::I've restored your version and done some additional clean-up. -- [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 14:45, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
::I've restored your version and done some additional clean-up. -- [[User:Diannaa|Diannaa]] ([[User talk:Diannaa|talk]]) 14:45, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
:: I would just like to note, since it has always irked me but I don't edit wikipedia very much, that you said "It doesn't matter who started this article." which seems to imply that I in some way have an "issue" with wikipedia policies. However, the user in question is not me... and the IPs involved were definitely not me (never lived in NYC!). So please don't insinuate that the person who started this article (me) is the person involved with other disputes with this article. Thank you. [[User:Viceroyvic|Viceroyvic]] ([[User talk:Viceroyvic|talk]]) 01:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)


== External links modified ==
== External links modified ==

Revision as of 01:47, 30 November 2017


General

This is the first article I have started from scratch. And it's 3:30 a.m., so go easy on me if you've got any critiques. Thanks! :) <3 Viceroyvic (talk)

Intro may need to be rewritten

The intro may need rewriting to ensure no POV, peacock words or other MOS-incompatibilities. Am tagging it to advise others and hopefully we can get this situation rectified and improve the overall quality of the article. JDanek007Talk 05:45, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be some serious ownership issues with this article. Almost all changes made are reverted by User:Friendlypete2014 and IP users. Any attempts to rewrite the article (which was rife is POV/peacock phrasing and other issues) are blindly reverted. Any at::tempts to tag the article for issues that were clearly a problem have also been reverted. It doesn't matter who started this article. Once you hit "Save", the article becomes property of Wikipedia and anyone can edit it. You do not get to dictate who can edit the article. The IP users who have been reverting along with Friendlypete2014 would do well to review WP:NOTVANDAL to see what actually constitutes as real vandalism. Edits you personally do not agree with are not vandalism nor are changes that are made to make the article conform to WP:MOS and WP:NPOV. I don't know what "rules" the article supposedly met before but there were serious issues with style, sources and puffery. I have reinstated the changes I made yesterday after they were incorrectly labeled as "vandalism" by 208.54.45.145. If anyone has issue with the changes, bring your gripes to the talk page. Blind reverts and edit warring are not acceptable. If it continues, page protection will be sought. Pinkadelica 11:56, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I've restored your version and done some additional clean-up. -- Diannaa (talk) 14:45, 20 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I would just like to note, since it has always irked me but I don't edit wikipedia very much, that you said "It doesn't matter who started this article." which seems to imply that I in some way have an "issue" with wikipedia policies. However, the user in question is not me... and the IPs involved were definitely not me (never lived in NYC!). So please don't insinuate that the person who started this article (me) is the person involved with other disputes with this article. Thank you. Viceroyvic (talk) 01:47, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Joan Smalls. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:00, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]