User talk:Dbachmann/archiveA: Difference between revisions
m →Ethos: polytonic transcludes lang + grc: subsistuting in advance of deletion; see Wikipedia:Templates for discussion#Template:Polytonic, replaced: {{polytonic| → {{lang|grc| using AWB |
m →Paris Riots: unlink to help with monitoring mainspace abuse of non-RS website using AWB |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
Found a link that purports to explain the "real' cause of the riots. the link is |
Found a link that purports to explain the "real' cause of the riots. the link is |
||
[[http//:www.infowars.com/articles/world/french_riots_engineered_by_globalists.htm]][http://www.infowars.com/ |
[[http//:www.infowars.com/articles/world/french_riots_engineered_by_globalists.htm]][<!-- unlinked to help with abuse monitoring><nowiki>http://www.infowars.com/</nowiki> |
||
articles/world/french_riots_engineered_by_globalists.htm] |
articles/world/french_riots_engineered_by_globalists.htm] |
||
Revision as of 22:23, 2 December 2017
The prodigal returns
No, you don't want to look at your watchlist. Welcome back! Zora 18:07, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
- How am I? Pondering the nature of conflict and debate, and noticing that some of us make it, or gravitate towards it. Trying not to be one of those people. Wondering how Wikipedia can screen out paranoid schizophrenics who write nonsense and then when it's deleted, get to have fun being persecuted. It reminds me of a Green Party meeting many years ago, which was invaded by a nut from the street who was allowed to lecture us for half an hour on why he was the rightful emperor of China. Anyone who protested this waste of time (like me) was told that we were suppressing free speech. SNARL! <^^^^^> Well, that ought to drive you right back into wiki-vacation. I rewrote the Islamic conquest of Iran article and so far have had no feedback. See what you think. Article probably needs work. Zora 22:32, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Looking....
I did'nt know you're a Admin. I've been looking for one as a guide that I can turn to from time to time. Actually,I'm looking for 4 Admin.s as guides. How else will I will be able to stay out of trouble, report it, NOT end up in it unwittingly ? I hope this is'nt a stupid question.Martial Law 20:05, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Paris Riots
What the...?! You've just reverted a whole lot of different things, including several typofixes, in the 2005 French civil unrest article with the edit summary 'unnoted vandalism'. I'm undoing that right now since I see no way of telling what was valid and what was collateral damage, and you're welcome to re-rectify the mistakes but I ask you not to throw the baby out with the bathwater. --Kizor 09:40, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
- well, if you had given me two minutes I would have re-inserted the material I had reverted. As it is, I trust you will take care to remove the edits by User:Swollib. I figured it would be easier to revert and then re-add the good edits, but you are free to do it your way. dab (ᛏ) 09:42, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
- Okay, okay. I jumped the gun. Sorry. Honestly. In my defense, there was nothing to indicate that you were going to restore content. Sheesh, I need a break from this article, but I'll get on with undoing the damage I caused now... --Kizor 09:45, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
There. Going through a list of changes, fact-checking them one by one and reinserting most into an article busily edited all the while is not something I want to do again. I was not able to verify the number of vehicles burned (5600/5700) and the times of the energy crisis (1970/1973) and unemployment increase (1960s/1980s). The latter versions of all three were left standing. --Kizor 10:32, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
dont you think the page is better as a whole now without the political quotes standing over it?--Whywhywhy 13:09, 8 November 2005 (UTC)
Found a link that purports to explain the "real' cause of the riots. the link is http//:www.infowars.com/articles/world/french_riots_engineered_by_globalists.htm[