User talk:Kriswarry

Welcome!

Hello, Kriswarry, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! DS 12:31, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

December 2017

Hello, I'm Acroterion. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Field Spaniel, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 12:57, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Please let me finish the edits!!

I am disabled so slow. Please see the page for wartenbergs migratory sensory neuropathy for my editing. This page is being edoyed with the go ahead of the field spaniel society, and is new content, so there isnt a reference yet! I am an author with over 30 years experince in them whose mother wrote a definitive book on their anatomy Kriswarry (talk) 13:04, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

The issue is that you are adding content without any references. Does the society have web content that you can use as a reference? That would be a valid source, but you can't just place commentary into an article (a reviewed Good Article at that) at the request of others. Please use the talkpage to develop a proposed text and references that can be used in the article. That's what the talkpage is for, it's not appropriate to leave comments in articles. Acroterion (talk) 13:11, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

<Replying to message on my talkpage> No, you just linked to the main page of the website. As a published author, I think you understand referencing, even if the Wikipedia format is a bit difficult to master. Is there a specific citation you can provide to support the commentary? Please propose it on the article talkpage, which will allow for discussion and orderly referencing - we can help. Acroterion (talk) 13:17, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

Also, right now you're edit-warring, rather than discussing. I've opened a discussion on the talkpage, please participate there. Acroterion (talk) 13:23, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

it now has full references, why is it still being deleted as unsubstantiuated?

Speedy deletion nomination of Larger of the Spaniel breeds, with a weight scale up to 40-55 pounds

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Larger of the Spaniel breeds, with a weight scale up to 40-55 pounds requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 13:35, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

I have contested thanks. The edits now include the references to the Breed Standard from the UK official site where the breed originated. however the editor is still deleting as unsubstantiated - ie he isnt rereading to check I have now complied, please advise?

The page only contains an external link. The article is tagged as "... an article that contains no content whatsoever, or consists only of external links, categories [...]", so the tag appears to be relevant. Maybe you added content but did not save it? That can happen. If the article is deleted, you can create it as a draft which will give you more time to work on it. --bonadea contributions talk 14:00, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

December 2017

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Field Spaniel. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block.

Each of the last reverts added the references, but the editor is still deleting it as unsubstantiated despite the edits being fully referenced and within guidelines

Please use the talk page. Present your suggested additions or changes there, and wait for people to comment on them instead of editing the article directly. bonadea contributions talk 13:44, 5 December 2017 (UTC)

It is being discussed on the private FSS members group on facebook, I am the messenger. The committee are not IT literate and will not comment here.