Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliott Michael Smith: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
not undisclosed |
XOR'easter (talk | contribs) →Elliott Michael Smith: delsort |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
* '''Delete''' as spam, created in return for undisclosed payments, in violation of terms of use. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 00:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC) |
* '''Delete''' as spam, created in return for undisclosed payments, in violation of terms of use. <b>[[User Talk:JzG|Guy]]</b> <small>([[User:JzG/help|Help!]])</small> 00:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC) |
||
::{{ping|JzG}} It's disclosed on the talk page, so I don't think there's a violation of the ToU in this case. Still spammy, though. – [[User:Joe Roe|Joe]] <small>([[User talk:Joe Roe|talk]])</small> 00:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC) |
::{{ping|JzG}} It's disclosed on the talk page, so I don't think there's a violation of the ToU in this case. Still spammy, though. – [[User:Joe Roe|Joe]] <small>([[User talk:Joe Roe|talk]])</small> 00:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC) |
||
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers|list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:XOR'easter|XOR'easter]] ([[User talk:XOR'easter|talk]]) 00:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC)</small> |
|||
Revision as of 00:45, 6 December 2017
- Elliott Michael Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Paid-for article on a non-notable individual. The two references that aren't misused primary or nonindependent sources (i.e. [1] and [2]) only mention Smith in passing, and searches turn up no significant coverage. – Joe (talk) 00:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as spam, created in return for undisclosed payments, in violation of terms of use. Guy (Help!) 00:17, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- @JzG: It's disclosed on the talk page, so I don't think there's a violation of the ToU in this case. Still spammy, though. – Joe (talk) 00:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 00:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC)