Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elliott Michael Smith: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Listing at WP:DELSORT under California (FWDS)
Line 9: Line 9:
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers|list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:XOR&#39;easter|XOR&#39;easter]] ([[User talk:XOR&#39;easter|talk]]) 00:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Actors and filmmakers|list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:XOR&#39;easter|XOR&#39;easter]] ([[User talk:XOR&#39;easter|talk]]) 00:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/California|list of California-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 00:46, 6 December 2017 (UTC)</small>
:<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the [[Wikipedia:WikiProject Deletion sorting/California|list of California-related deletion discussions]]. [[User:CAPTAIN RAJU|<span style="font-family: Bradley Hand ITC;">'''CAPTAIN RAJU'''</span>]]<sup>[[User_talk:CAPTAIN RAJU|(T)]]</sup> 00:46, 6 December 2017 (UTC)</small>
*'''Delete''' aspiring Hollywood person who apparently spent his advertising bucks here [[WP:TOOSOON]] ☆ [[User:Bri|Bri]] ([[User talk:Bri|talk]]) 01:01, 6 December 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:01, 6 December 2017

Elliott Michael Smith (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Paid-for article on a non-notable individual. The two references that aren't misused primary or nonindependent sources (i.e. [1] and [2]) only mention Smith in passing, and searches turn up no significant coverage. – Joe (talk) 00:04, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@JzG: It's disclosed on the talk page, so I don't think there's a violation of the ToU in this case. Still spammy, though. – Joe (talk) 00:24, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. XOR'easter (talk) 00:45, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:46, 6 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]