Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eleanor Lam: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
Cwmhiraeth (talk | contribs) Delete |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*'''Delete''' per nom. This article looks more like a tabloid article and a LinkedIn profile combined rather than something to be shelved on Wikipedia. [[User:Ernestchuajiasheng|Ernestchuajiasheng]] ([[User talk:Ernestchuajiasheng|talk]]) 10:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' per nom. This article looks more like a tabloid article and a LinkedIn profile combined rather than something to be shelved on Wikipedia. [[User:Ernestchuajiasheng|Ernestchuajiasheng]] ([[User talk:Ernestchuajiasheng|talk]]) 10:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' - Makes no claims of notability. I can find no reliable sources and consider this individual does not meet [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 18:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' - Makes no claims of notability. I can find no reliable sources and consider this individual does not meet [[WP:GNG]]. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 18:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC) |
||
*Sorry but that's incorrect. There's a multitude of articles concerning this individual and she is newsworthy. My suggestion is the article is moved back to a draft and I will work on expanding this stub with further sources. [[User:Cashannam|Cashannam]] ([[User talk:Cashannam|talk]]) 00:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 00:52, 7 December 2017
- Eleanor Lam (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability, does not appear to meet notability criteria. Citobun (talk) 05:22, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 05:28, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 05:28, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 05:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. Babymissfortune 05:29, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. This article looks more like a tabloid article and a LinkedIn profile combined rather than something to be shelved on Wikipedia. Ernestchuajiasheng (talk) 10:56, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - Makes no claims of notability. I can find no reliable sources and consider this individual does not meet WP:GNG. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 18:13, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry but that's incorrect. There's a multitude of articles concerning this individual and she is newsworthy. My suggestion is the article is moved back to a draft and I will work on expanding this stub with further sources. Cashannam (talk) 00:52, 7 December 2017 (UTC)