User talk:S-man

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

S-man (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am sorry for what I have done. You said I was a Wikipedia vandal - I DO NOT vandalize Wikipedia. I have vandalized some other wikis, but I am sorry for that. I will not do what I have been doing if you unblock me. Thank you. --S-man 00:11, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your list includes at least two other wikimedia wikipedia projects, sorry no.

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'm sorry, but it's hard to assume good faith, particularly from an editor with a "secret vandal project" with an adult writing style who claims to be 9 years old. Please go away. -- The Anome 00:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

I AM NINE YEARS OLD. And I apoligize for what I have done. I love Wikipedia - I've gone here for research, for almost everything, and I spend almost half my time on the internet on here. I do read and write at an adult level, but I am nine years old. If you don't believe me, you can ask Pizzachelle - she is my aunt. I actually introduced her to Wikipedia, and I encouraged her to become a Wikipedian after she said that had a lot of good information, and is very helpful. I WILL NOT VANDALIZE AGAIN. I will do anything - I am very sorry for what happen - me and Cute 1 4 u can just call this whole secret vandal business quits. I actually was trying to revert vandalism when I found out that I had been blocked. I will assume good faith, and I do not want to go away. I believe there is no other website to go to if you block me for life. Please unblock me - I, once again, apoligize and I will do anything. Thank you. --S-man 00:28, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Sadly, there is nothing we can do to help you. Even "jokes" about vandalism are taken seriously on Wikipedia. We remind you that we are not blocking you for your age, but your actions, even if they may have been false. Ryūlóng 00:32, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

But I did not contribute any serious vandalism to THIS Wikipedia, in fact I have only contributed very few vandalism to this Wikipedia. The vandalism was not a "joke". I need Wikipedia - I don't really know where else to do things. I come here all the time for everything. Can you please at least just make it a week-long block or a 24-hour block? I will never vandalize any wiki again. --S-man 00:36, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

I cannot do anything. Despite whatever you state concerning your innocence, your actions are still forbidden on any Wikipedia, in any way shape or form. Ryūlóng 00:44, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

But can I please contact an admin to see if we can make this block a 24 hour block or a 2-day block? --S-man 00:48, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

The Admins will not unblock You S-Man you vandalised and threatened to vandalise. *Shakes his head* Æon ^{Insane Ward} 22:39, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia, per ruling of administrators, Jimbo Wales and/or the Arbitration Committee. See block log. (toolbox: contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

What's all the hubbub about S-man being blocked? What did he do wrong?

S-man, I am really User:Kitia. Since you are my friend, I am here to help. What happened? I will contact my good friend and admin Mangojuice if anything is wrong. Uncle Kitia 20:12, 15 October 2006 (UTC)