Legendre's three-square theorem: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
[[Pierre de Fermat]] gave a criterion for numbers of the form 3''a'' + 1 to be a sum of three squares essentially equivalent to Legendre's theorem, but did not provide a proof. |
[[Pierre de Fermat]] gave a criterion for numbers of the form 3''a'' + 1 to be a sum of three squares essentially equivalent to Legendre's theorem, but did not provide a proof. |
||
N. Beguelin noticed in 1774<ref>''Nouveaux Mémoires de l'Académie de Berlin'' (1774, publ. 1776), |
N. Beguelin noticed in 1774<ref>''Nouveaux Mémoires de l'Académie de Berlin'' (1774, publ. 1776), pp. 313–369.</ref> that every positive integer which is neither of the form 8''n'' + 7, nor of the form 4''n'', is the sum of three squares, but did not provide a satisfactory proof.<ref>[[Leonard Eugene Dickson]], ''History of the theory of numbers'', vol. II, p. 15 (Carnegie Institute of Washington 1919; AMS Chelsea Publ., 1992, reprint).</ref> In 1796 Gauss proved his [[Eureka theorem]] that every positive integer ''n'' is the sum of 3 [[triangular number]]s; this is equivalent to the fact that 8''n'' + 3 is a sum of three squares. In 1797 or 1798 [[Adrien-Marie Legendre|A.-M. Legendre]] obtained the first proof of his 3 square theorem.<ref>A.-M. Legendre, ''Essai sur la théorie des nombres'', Paris, An VI (1797–1798), {{p.|202}} and pp. 398–399.</ref> In 1813, [[Augustin Louis Cauchy|A. L. Cauchy]] noted<ref>A. L. Cauchy, ''Mém. Sci. Math. Phys. de l'Institut de France'', (1) 14 (1813–1815), 177.</ref> that Legendre's theorem is equivalent to the statement in the introduction above. Previously, in 1801, [[Carl Friedrich Gauss|C. F. Gauss]] had obtained a more general result,<ref>C. F. Gauss, ''[[Disquisitiones Arithmeticae]]'', Art. 291 et 292.</ref> containing Legendre theorem of 1797–8 as a corollary. In particular, Gauss counted the number of solutions of the expression of an integer as a sum of three squares, and this is a generalisation of yet another result of Legendre,<ref>A.-M. Legendre, ''Hist. et Mém. Acad. Roy. Sci. Paris'', 1785, pp. 514–515.</ref> whose proof is incomplete. This last fact appears to be the reason for later incorrect claims according to which Legendre's proof of the three-square theorem was defective and had to be completed by Gauss.<ref>See for instance: Elena Deza and M. Deza. ''Figurate numbers''. World Scientific 2011, p. 314 [https://books.google.ch/books?id=cDxYdstLPz4C&pg=PA314&lpg=PA314&dq=%22figurate+numbers%22+incomplete+legendre+gauss++-wikipedia&source=bl&ots=rAuaEsw2cA&sig=0wZEagVD2TzGjMVG1Xv_Cj-VYZo&hl=en&sa=X&ei=1ARgU7CuG4Kw4QSPqYG4BA&ved=0CCgQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=%22figurate%20numbers%22%20incomplete%20legendre%20gauss%20%20-wikipedia&f=false]</ref> |
||
With [[Lagrange's four-square theorem]] and the [[Fermat's theorem on sums of two squares|two-square theorem]] of Girard, Fermat and Euler, the [[Waring's problem]] for ''k'' = 2 is entirely solved. |
With [[Lagrange's four-square theorem]] and the [[Fermat's theorem on sums of two squares|two-square theorem]] of Girard, Fermat and Euler, the [[Waring's problem]] for ''k'' = 2 is entirely solved. |
||
Revision as of 21:16, 28 December 2017
In mathematics, Legendre's three-square theorem states that a natural number can be represented as the sum of three squares of integers
if and only if n is not of the form for integers a and b.
The first numbers that cannot be expressed as the sum of three squares (i.e. numbers that can be expressed as ) are
History
Pierre de Fermat gave a criterion for numbers of the form 3a + 1 to be a sum of three squares essentially equivalent to Legendre's theorem, but did not provide a proof. N. Beguelin noticed in 1774[1] that every positive integer which is neither of the form 8n + 7, nor of the form 4n, is the sum of three squares, but did not provide a satisfactory proof.[2] In 1796 Gauss proved his Eureka theorem that every positive integer n is the sum of 3 triangular numbers; this is equivalent to the fact that 8n + 3 is a sum of three squares. In 1797 or 1798 A.-M. Legendre obtained the first proof of his 3 square theorem.[3] In 1813, A. L. Cauchy noted[4] that Legendre's theorem is equivalent to the statement in the introduction above. Previously, in 1801, C. F. Gauss had obtained a more general result,[5] containing Legendre theorem of 1797–8 as a corollary. In particular, Gauss counted the number of solutions of the expression of an integer as a sum of three squares, and this is a generalisation of yet another result of Legendre,[6] whose proof is incomplete. This last fact appears to be the reason for later incorrect claims according to which Legendre's proof of the three-square theorem was defective and had to be completed by Gauss.[7]
With Lagrange's four-square theorem and the two-square theorem of Girard, Fermat and Euler, the Waring's problem for k = 2 is entirely solved.
Proofs
The "only if" of the theorem is simply because modulo 8, every square is congruent to 0, 1 or 4. There are several proofs of the converse (besides Legendre's proof). One of them is due to J. P. G. L. Dirichlet in 1850, and has become classical.[8] It requires three main lemmas:
- the quadratic reciprocity law,
- Dirichlet's theorem on arithmetic progressions, and
- the equivalence class of the trivial ternary quadratic form.
Relationship to the four-square theorem
This theorem can be used to prove Lagrange's four-square theorem, which states that all natural numbers can be written as a sum of four squares. Gauss[9] pointed out that the four squares theorem follows easily from the fact that any positive integer that is 1 or 2 mod 4 is a sum of 3 squares, because any positive integer not divisible by 4 can be reduced to this form by subtracting 0 or 1 from it. However, proving the three-square theorem is considerably more difficult than a direct proof of the four-square theorem that does not use the three-square theorem. Indeed, the four-square theorem was proved earlier, in 1770.
See also
Notes
- ^ Nouveaux Mémoires de l'Académie de Berlin (1774, publ. 1776), pp. 313–369.
- ^ Leonard Eugene Dickson, History of the theory of numbers, vol. II, p. 15 (Carnegie Institute of Washington 1919; AMS Chelsea Publ., 1992, reprint).
- ^ A.-M. Legendre, Essai sur la théorie des nombres, Paris, An VI (1797–1798), p. 202 and pp. 398–399.
- ^ A. L. Cauchy, Mém. Sci. Math. Phys. de l'Institut de France, (1) 14 (1813–1815), 177.
- ^ C. F. Gauss, Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, Art. 291 et 292.
- ^ A.-M. Legendre, Hist. et Mém. Acad. Roy. Sci. Paris, 1785, pp. 514–515.
- ^ See for instance: Elena Deza and M. Deza. Figurate numbers. World Scientific 2011, p. 314 [1]
- ^ See for instance vol. I, parts I, II and III of : E. Landau, Vorlesungen über Zahlentheorie, New York, Chelsea, 1927. Second edition translated into English by Jacob E. Goodman, Providence RH, Chelsea, 1958.
- ^ Gauss, Carl Friedrich (1965), Disquisitiones Arithmeticae, Yale University Press, p. 342, section 293, ISBN 0-300-09473-6