Talk:Project Runway

Assessment comment

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Project Runway/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Start-class from LGBT project. HIgh-importance within fashion because it's very successful and has spawned a UK version. Daniel Case 17:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

Last edited at 17:14, 27 March 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 03:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Article WP:OR

I have tagged each of the articles contestant progress chart with "{{Original research|table}}" for the following reasons:

1. Stating a contestant did HIGH or LOW in almost all of the cases is WP:Original Research. In the show, aside from some cases where the host makes it clear who made it to the top, the presenter does not explicitly say who did bad and who did good.
2. A reliable source, including the source material, can not be provided where it states which contestants placement was; Top or Bottom.
3. To infer that most of these contestants are the Top/Bottom, one must interpret from the source material's comments about their performance, about how they did and decide if they did good or bad. Since not everyone's perspectives are the same, there is not a 100% way to WP:Verify this information.

Proposal

• Remove all of the unsourced HIGHs and LOWs that have to be interpreted from the source material and leave the ones that the presenter clearly states are in the Top/Bottom, which would not leave many in each respective seasons.

— Presented by Chase (talk) 14:14, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

In the show, after the judges interview the 6 designers they brought back, they have their little "private" discussion, and here it is clear who placed where, as Heidi uses langage like "Let's talk about the designers we liked", or "let's talk about the designers at the bottom". I don't think it's OR most of the time. --MASEM (t) 14:42, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Project Runway. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081020043626/http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/10/lifetime_wants_project_runway.php to http://www.tvweek.com/news/2008/10/lifetime_wants_project_runway.php
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091015065537/http://www.mylifetime.com/on-tv/shows/project-runway/project-runway-all-star-challenge to http://www.mylifetime.com/on-tv/shows/project-runway/project-runway-all-star-challenge

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:32, 30 December 2017 (UTC)