User talk:Singing guns: Difference between revisions
Singing guns (talk | contribs) |
Singing guns (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
your right a nice ref to a source but here's where I cant go on I didn’t want to be involved in the argument but seems I am now :p. I think the problem with these ref's is they are sourced from a review which could be challenged still as that isn’t technically "Official" even though its gamespy (hurraah for gamespy^^) but in any case maybe ill leave it to the crowds to make up there minds this part of the information is still disputable make no doubt so ill be interested to see how it turns out cya [[User:Singing guns|Singing guns]] 19:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC) |
your right a nice ref to a source but here's where I cant go on I didn’t want to be involved in the argument but seems I am now :p. I think the problem with these ref's is they are sourced from a review which could be challenged still as that isn’t technically "Official" even though its gamespy (hurraah for gamespy^^) but in any case maybe ill leave it to the crowds to make up there minds this part of the information is still disputable make no doubt so ill be interested to see how it turns out cya [[User:Singing guns|Singing guns]] 19:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Jeez not again come on people! == |
|||
{{unblock-auto|64.233.173.85|Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "MyWikiBiz". The reason given for MyWikiBiz's block is: "inappropriate use of Wikipedia name in commerce; implying that people can pay him to get list}} |
Revision as of 02:54, 17 October 2006
Please talk in English
[1]
Translation? -- Steel 18:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Sure :), well what I meant is that if your case in point is to revert the deletions being made you should do so following procedure. In that point exactly the article needs a CITING and a source but not a ref that is in game please check the talk page of SOTC again , thanks Singing guns 18:49, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- What are you on about? "The game is set in a traditional fantasy world" has two references. One is from GameSpy and the other is from Computerandvideogames. Why are these being removed? -- Steel 18:51, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
your right a nice ref to a source but here's where I cant go on I didn’t want to be involved in the argument but seems I am now :p. I think the problem with these ref's is they are sourced from a review which could be challenged still as that isn’t technically "Official" even though its gamespy (hurraah for gamespy^^) but in any case maybe ill leave it to the crowds to make up there minds this part of the information is still disputable make no doubt so ill be interested to see how it turns out cya Singing guns 19:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Jeez not again come on people!
Singing guns (block log • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))
IP address: 64.233.173.85 (block log • active blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • unblock • checkuser (log))
Blocking admin: not provided.
Block message:
WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
instead.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Singing guns}}
on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:
{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=not provided | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "MyWikiBiz". The reason given for MyWikiBiz's block is: "inappropriate use of Wikipedia name in commerce; implying that people can pay him to get list</nowiki> | 3=64.233.173.85 | 4= | 5=~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here
with any specific rationale. If the decline=
parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.
{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=64.233.173.85 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "MyWikiBiz". The reason given for MyWikiBiz's block is: "inappropriate use of Wikipedia name in commerce; implying that people can pay him to get list</nowiki> | 3=not provided | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=64.233.173.85 | 2=<nowiki>Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "MyWikiBiz". The reason given for MyWikiBiz's block is: "inappropriate use of Wikipedia name in commerce; implying that people can pay him to get list</nowiki> | 3=not provided | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}