Talk:Supermoon: Difference between revisions
→gallery: new section |
→Frequency: new section |
||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
what, if any, of these images demonstrate the subject of this article? An image comparing the full moon at perigee and apogee would be good but these all just look like images of the full moon.--[[User:MadeYourReadThis|MadeYourReadThis]] ([[User talk:MadeYourReadThis|talk]]) 17:56, 7 January 2018 (UTC) |
what, if any, of these images demonstrate the subject of this article? An image comparing the full moon at perigee and apogee would be good but these all just look like images of the full moon.--[[User:MadeYourReadThis|MadeYourReadThis]] ([[User talk:MadeYourReadThis|talk]]) 17:56, 7 January 2018 (UTC) |
||
== Frequency == |
|||
This section has been removed because it is unreferenced original research, and incomplete at that. |
|||
Additionally, there was no indication that this research took into account the fact that full moon's that occur ''near'' perigee per Nolle's definition (the closest thing to official we have) and its arbitrary selection of 90% of closest perigee to Earth in a solar year. This second is incomplete since the difference between perigees and apogees yearly extreme vary by 49k-50k, the frequency of "supermoon" is not only impacted by the natural variation in the length of a lunar month but that same precession affects apsis. But this too is original research and inappropriate for inclusion as a result. The arbitrary selection of calculating based on 90% of the delta of yearly extremes in Nolle's definition make discussion of frequency solely in terms of precession moot. |
|||
Bottom line, let's leave this aspect of the topic alone until it's covered in a reliable source that can be referenced.--[[User:MadeYourReadThis|MadeYourReadThis]] ([[User talk:MadeYourReadThis|talk]]) 13:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:29, 8 January 2018
Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Supermoon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Supermoon article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 3 months |
gallery
what, if any, of these images demonstrate the subject of this article? An image comparing the full moon at perigee and apogee would be good but these all just look like images of the full moon.--MadeYourReadThis (talk) 17:56, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Frequency
This section has been removed because it is unreferenced original research, and incomplete at that.
Additionally, there was no indication that this research took into account the fact that full moon's that occur near perigee per Nolle's definition (the closest thing to official we have) and its arbitrary selection of 90% of closest perigee to Earth in a solar year. This second is incomplete since the difference between perigees and apogees yearly extreme vary by 49k-50k, the frequency of "supermoon" is not only impacted by the natural variation in the length of a lunar month but that same precession affects apsis. But this too is original research and inappropriate for inclusion as a result. The arbitrary selection of calculating based on 90% of the delta of yearly extremes in Nolle's definition make discussion of frequency solely in terms of precession moot.
Bottom line, let's leave this aspect of the topic alone until it's covered in a reliable source that can be referenced.--MadeYourReadThis (talk) 13:29, 8 January 2018 (UTC)