Talk:Unbihexium: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Eka-Plutonium== |
|||
Unbihexium is not eka-plutonium. Plutonium is over 144. |
|||
==Island of Stability== |
==Island of Stability== |
||
* looks like this was accidentally swept up in the VfD of Unbiseptium and Unbipentium. [[User:132.205.45.110|132.205.45.110]] 18:39, 3 September 2005 (UTC) |
* looks like this was accidentally swept up in the VfD of Unbiseptium and Unbipentium. [[User:132.205.45.110|132.205.45.110]] 18:39, 3 September 2005 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 06:36, 17 October 2006
Eka-Plutonium
Unbihexium is not eka-plutonium. Plutonium is over 144.
Island of Stability
- looks like this was accidentally swept up in the VfD of Unbiseptium and Unbipentium. 132.205.45.110 18:39, 3 September 2005 (UTC)
Half-Life?
I can't find any verification that this element has a predicted half-life on the order of a million years. If nobody else can find anything, please delete that. Zelmerszoetrop 19:51, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
- OK, delete the information about the half-life it is wrong, but not the article. Reply to David Latapie 03:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
would who ever it is who keeps vandalizing pages to remove the extend periodic table for heavy elements =
Please stop. Stirling Newberry 15:45, 11 August 2006 (UTC)